General Social Survey 2002 [United States]
- Document Description
- Study Description
- Data Files Description
- Variables Description
Please note: this codebook has been prepared in accordance with the Data Documentation Initiative's XML DTD. For more information, please consult the DDI documentation at http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/DDI/.
Document Description-- Marked-up Document
Title: General Social Survey 2002 [United States]
CPANDA Identification Number: a00079
Authors: Davis, James A., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago; Smith, Tom W., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago; and Marsden, Peter V., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, Uiversity of Chicago
Producer: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive
Copyright: Copyright, Princeton University, 2003
Date of Production: June 25, 2003
Place of Production: Princeton, NJ: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive
Software Used in Production: NetBeans IDE, Version 3.4
Funding Agency: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive
Grant Number: 2000-001763
Distributor: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive, Social Science Reference Center, Princeton University Library
Contact Person: CPANDA, Princeton University (cpanda@princeton.edu)
Depositor: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive, Social Science Reference Center, Princeton University Library
Date of Deposit: May 6, 2003
Date of Distribution: July 2, 2003
Series Name: National Data Program for the Social Sciences Series; no. 17
Series Information: The National Data Program for the Social Sciences (General Social Survey) is both a data diffusion project and a program of social indicator research. Its data collection instrument is the General Social Surveys (GSS), interviews administered to NORC national samples using a standard questionnaire. Previously an annual survey, the GSS became biennial in 1994.
Version: First CPANDA Edition
Version Responsibility: CPANDA, Princeton University
Bibliographic Citation:
Davis, James Allan, Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. 2003. GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEY 2002 [codebook file]. CPANDA ed. Princeton, NJ: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive [producer and distributor].
Holdings Information: Marked-up codebook for General Social Survey 2002 [United States]
Document Description-- Source Document
Title: General Social Surveys, 1972-2002: Cumulative Codebook
Authors: Davis, James A., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago; Smith, Tom W., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago; and Marsden, Peter V., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Producer: The National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Copyright: 2002
Date of Production: February 2003
Place of Production: Chicago, Illinois
Funding Agency: The National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Grant Number: SBR-9617727
Distributor: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs
Depositor: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, Storrs
Date of Deposit: May 6, 2003
Date of Distribution: February 2003
Series Name: National Data Program for the Social Sciences Series; no. 17
Series Information: The National Data Program for the Social Sciences (General Social Survey) is both a data diffusion project and a program of social indicator research. Its data collection instrument is the General Social Surveys (GSS), interviews administered to NORC national samples using a standard questionnaire. Previously an annual survey, the GSS became biennial in 1994.
Version Responsibility: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Bibliographic Citation:
Davis, James Allan, Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. 2002. General Social Surveys, 1972-2002: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago, Illinois: National Opinion Research Center.
Study Description-- Citation - Data Collection
Title: General Social Survey 2002 [United States]
CPANDA Identification Number: a00079
Authors: Davis, James A., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago; Smith, Tom W., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago; and Marsden, Peter V., National Data Program for the Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Producer: The National Data Program for Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Copyright: 2002
Date of Production: February, 2003
Place of Production: Chicago, Illinois
Funding Agency: The National Data Program for Social Sciences, National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Grant Number: SBR-9617727
Distributor: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut
Depositor: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut
Date of Deposit: May 6, 2003
Date of Distribution: July 2, 2003
Series Name: National Data Program for the Social Sciences Series; no. 17
Series Information: The National Data Program for the Social Sciences (General Social Survey) is both a data diffusion project and a program of social indicator research. Its data collection instrument is the General Social Surveys (GSS), interviews administered to NORC national samples using a standard questionnaire. Previously an annual survey, the GSS became biennial in 1994.
Version Responsibility: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago
Bibliographic Citation:
Davis, James Allan, Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. 2002. GENERAL SOCIAL SURVEY 2002 [UNITED STATES] [computer file]. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [produce]; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributer].
- Social indicators. United States
- Public opinion. United States
- Social surveys. United States
- Arts surveys. United States
- Art and society. United States
- Performing arts (general)
- Visual arts
- Arts education for the public
- Arts in higher education
- Media coverage of arts and culture
- Television coverage
- Participation in arts and leisure activities
- Audiences and attendance
- Leisure and recreational activities (non-arts-related)
- Reading
- Sporting events
- Public attitudes and arts advocacy
- Public attitudes and opinions
- Public attitudes on government support for the arts
- Public attitudes on arts, artists, and culture
- Arts participation
- Social attitudes
- Cultural attitudes
Study Description-- Study Scope
Study Description -- Methodology
Study Description -- Data Access
Extent of Collection: 1 datafile and machine-readable documentation
Note: Meaningful File Name for this Data Set: gss02
Citation Requirement: Users of CPANDA data collections are requested to acknowledge these sources by means of bibliographic citations in the footnotes, endnotes or reference apparatus of publications. Deposit Requirement: Users of CPANDA data collections are requested to forward citations or copies of publications resulting from analysis of CPANDA data collections to the archive. Access Conditions(CPANDA): For detailed information about conditions for use of CPANDA data collections, please see the End User Agreement posted on the CPANDA web site.Data Files Description
File Name: a00079
Overall Case Count: 2765 Overall Variable Count: 1009 Logical Record Length: 1353Type of File: ASCII data file
Data Format: logical record length format
Place of File Production: Princeton, NJ: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive
Extent of Processing Checks- The Archive produced a codebook for this collection.
- Consistency checks were performed by the Archive.
- Frequencies were provided by the Archive.
- The Archive performed recodes.
- Data were reformatted by the Archive.
- Checks for undocumented codes were performed by the Archive.
Version: First CPANDA Edition
Version Responsibility Statement: Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Archive
Variables
- CASEID
- Sequential Record ID
Column: 1
Width: 5
Type: numeric
- YEAR
- GSS year for this respondent
Column: 6
Width: 4
Type: numeric
Text: GSS year for this respondent
- ID
- Respondent ID number
Column: 10
Width: 4
Type: numeric
Text: Respondent ID number
- WRKSTAT
- Labor force status
Survey Question: Last week were you working full-time, part-time, going to school, keeping house, or what?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Working full-time | 1432 |
| 2 | Working part-time | 312 |
| 3 | Temp not working | 52 |
| 4 | Unempl, laid off | 121 |
| 5 | Retired | 414 |
| 6 | School | 78 |
| 7 | Keeping house | 268 |
| 8 | Other | 88 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 14
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card A. Circle one code only. If more than one response, give preference to smallest code number that applies. REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with WRKSTAT, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56. Card A contained responses for Punches 1 through 8. Contents of Col. 9, Punch 8 (Other, SPECIFY) available from NORC. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- HRS1
- Number of hours worked last week
Survey Question: If working full or part-time: How many hours did you work last week at all jobs?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 3 |
| 99 | Not available | 12 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 1021 |
Column: 15
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix L: Hours worked, for detailed distribution and explanation. The distribution for the first digit, Col. 10, is given below. Responses greater than 89 in parts A and B were coded 89. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- HRS2
- Number of hours usually work a week
Survey Question: If with a job, but not at work: How many hours a week do you usually work at all jobs?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 0 |
| 99 | Not available | 2 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 2713 |
Column: 17
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix L: Hours worked, for detailed distribution and explanation. The distribution for the first digit, Col. 10, is given below. Responses greater than 89 in parts A and B were coded 89. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- EVWORK
- Ever work as long as one year
Survey Question: If retired, in school, keeping house, or others: Did you ever work for as long as one year?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1917 |
| 1 | Yes | 757 |
| 2 | No | 89 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 19
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- WRKSLF
- R self-emp or works for somebody
Survey Question: (Are/Were) you self employed or (do/did) you work for someone else?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 91 |
| 1 | Self-employed | 307 |
| 2 | Someone else | 2362 |
| 8 | Don't know | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 20
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- WRKGOVT
- Govt or private employee
Survey Question: (Are/Were) you employed by the federal, state or local government or by a private employer (including non-profit organizations)?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 91 |
| 1 | Government | 471 |
| 2 | Private | 2176 |
| 8 | Don't know | 17 |
| 9 | Not available | 10 |
Column: 21
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- OCC80
- R's census occupation code (1980)
Survey Question: What kind of work do you (did you normally) do? That is, what (is/as) your job called?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 989
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 91 |
| 990 | Not available | 0 |
| 998 | Don't know | 1 |
| 999 | Not available | 29 |
Column: 22
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.2 for question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks. Commute is a two-digit variable. The numbers above are collapsed for convenience of display.
- PRESTG80
- R's occupational prestige score (1980)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 99
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Don't know, not available, not applicable | 122 |
Column: 25
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.2 for question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks. Commute is a two-digit variable. The numbers above are collapsed for convenience of display.
- INDUS80
- R's industry code (1980)
Survey Question: What (do/did) you actually do in that job? Tell me, what (are/were) some of your main duties? What kind of place (do/did) you work for?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 989
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 91 |
| 990 | Not available | 32 |
| 998 | Don't know | 1 |
| 999 | Not available | 8 |
Column: 27
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.2 for question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks. Commute is a two-digit variable. The numbers above are collapsed for convenience of display.
- MARITAL
- Marital status
Survey Question: Are you currently -- married, widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never been married?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Married | 1269 |
| 2 | Widowed | 247 |
| 3 | Divorced | 445 |
| 4 | Separated | 96 |
| 5 | Never married | 708 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 30
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- DIVORCE
- Ever been divorced or separated
Survey Question: If currently married or widowed: Have you ever been divorced or legally separated?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1249 |
| 1 | Yes | 361 |
| 2 | No | 1155 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 31
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- WIDOWED
- Ever been widowed
Survey Question: If currently married, separated, or divorced: Have you ever been widowed?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 955 |
| 1 | Yes | 56 |
| 2 | No | 1754 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 32
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SPWRKSTA
- Spouse labor force status
Survey Question: Last week was your (wife/husband) working full-time, part-time, going to school, keeping home, or what?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1496 |
| 1 | Working full-time | 704 |
| 2 | Working part-time | 142 |
| 3 | Temp not working | 30 |
| 4 | Unemployed, laid off | 33 |
| 5 | Retired | 164 |
| 6 | School | 13 |
| 7 | Keeping house | 159 |
| 8 | Other | 22 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 33
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if R is currently married. Others, skip to instructions before Q.8. Hand [respondent] Card B. Circle one code only. If more than one response, give preference to the smallest code number that applies. REMARKS: Contents of Col. 40, Punch 8 (Other, SPECIFY), available from NORC. Card B contained responses for Punches 1 through 8. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- SPHRS1
- Number of hrs spouse worked last week
Survey Question: If working full or part-time: How many hours did (he/she)work last week, at all jobs?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 7 |
| 99 | Not available | 8 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 1917 |
Column: 34
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix L: Hours worked, for detailed distribution. The distribution for the first digit, Col. 41, is given below. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- SPHRS2
- No. of hrs spouse usually works a week
Survey Question: If with a job but not at work: How many hours a week does (he/she) usually work, at all jobs?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 0 |
| 99 | Not available | 5 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 2733 |
Column: 36
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix L: Hours worked, for detailed distribution. The distribution for the first digit, Col. 43, is given below. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- SPEVWORK
- Spouse ever work as long as a year
Survey Question: If retired, in school, keeping house, or others: Did (he/she) ever work for as long as one year?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2405 |
| 1 | Yes | 307 |
| 2 | No | 49 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 38
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SPWRKSLF
- Spouse self-emp or works for somebody
Survey Question: (Is/Was)(he/she) self-employed or (does/did)(he/she) work for someone else?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1547 |
| 1 | Self-employed | 172 |
| 2 | Someone else | 1042 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 39
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SPOCC80
- Spouse census occupation code (1980)
Survey Question: What kind of work (does/did) your [spouse] normally do? That is, what (is/was) (his/her) job called?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 999
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Don't know, not available, not applicable | 1547 |
Column: 40
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.6 for the question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- SPPRES80
- Spouses occupational prestige score (1980)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 99
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Don't know, not available, not applicable | 1566 |
Column: 43
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.6 for the question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- SPIND80
- Spouses industry code (1980)
Survey Question: What (does/did) [spouse] actually do in that job? Tell me, what (are/were) some of (his/her) main duties? What kind of place (does/did) [spouse] work for?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 999
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Don't know, not available, not applicable | 1547 |
Column: 45
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.6 for the question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- PAWRKSLF
- Father self-emp or worked for somebody
Survey Question: Was he self-employed or did he work for someone else?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 526 |
| 1 | Self-employed | 586 |
| 2 | Someone else | 1618 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 22 |
Column: 48
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- PAOCC80
- Fathers census occupation code (1980)
Survey Question: What kind of place did he work for?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 999
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 526 |
| 990 | Not available | 0 |
| 998 | Don't know | 14 |
| 999 | Not available | 60 |
Column: 49
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.6 for the question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- PAPRES80
- Fathers occupational prestige score (1980)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 99
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Don't know, not available, not applicable | 600 |
Column: 52
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.6 for the question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- PAIND80
- Fathers industry code (1980)
Survey Question: What did he actually do in that job? Tell me, what were some of his main duties? What kind of place did he work for?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 989
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 526 |
| 990 | Not available | 53 |
| 998 | Don't know | 7 |
| 999 | Not available | 20 |
Column: 54
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Q.6 for the question text and Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- MAOCC80
- Mothers census occupation code (1980)
Survey Question: What kind of work did your (mother/mother substitute) usually do while you were growing up? That is what was her job called?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 989
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1104 |
| 990 | Not available | 0 |
| 998 | Don't know | 5 |
| 999 | Not available | 37 |
Column: 57
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- MAPRES80
- Mothers occupational prestige score (1980)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 99
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Don't know, not available, not applicable | 1146 |
Column: 60
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- MAWRKSLF
- Mother self-emp or worked for somebody
Survey Question: Was she self-employed, or did she work for someone else?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1103 |
| 1 | Self-employed | 181 |
| 2 | Someone else | 1465 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 16 |
Column: 62
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- MAIND80
- Mothers industry code (1980)
Survey Question: What did she actually do in that job? Tell me, what were some of her main duties? What kind of place did she work for?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 989
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1104 |
| 990 | Not available | 33 |
| 998 | Don't know | 5 |
| 999 | Not available | 15 |
Column: 63
Width: 3
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Coded using the U.S. Bureau of the Census 3 digit occupation and industries codes for 1980 and the 2 digit 1989 GSS/NORC prestige score. See Appendices F-H for full details and distributions. The distributions above are for the first digit of each of the three codes, except that missing value codes are collapsed with blanks.
- SIBS
- Number of brothers and sisters
Survey Question: How many brothers and sisters did you have? Please count those born alive but no longer living. as well as those alive now. Also include stepbrothers and stepsisters, and children adopted by your parents.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 2 |
| 99 | Not available | 7 |
Column: 66
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for changes across surveys. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- CHILDS
- Number of children
Survey Question: How many children have you ever had? Please count all that were born alive at any time (including any you had from a previous marriage).
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 8 | Eight or more | 34 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 68
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- AGE
- Age of respondent
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 0 |
| 99 | Not available | 14 |
Column: 69
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Date of birth has been recoded into actual age in Cols. 92 and 93. See Appendix D: Recodes. See Appendix E: Age Distributions, for detailed responses. The distribution for the first digit, Col. 92 is given below. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- AGEKDBRN
- R's age when 1st child born
Survey Question: How old were you when your first child was born?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 799 |
| 98 | Don't know | 2 |
| 99 | Not available | 9 |
Column: 71
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: AGEKDBRN is coded in two digits. The collapsed numbers above are for convenience of display.
- EDUC
- Highest year of school completed
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that you finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did you ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did you complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If YES: How many years did you complete? Do you have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 96
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 97 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 98 | Don't know | 5 |
| 99 | Not available | 7 |
Column: 73
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Code exact grade or highest degree earned. REMARKS: See Appendix D: Recodes, for a discussion of original format of Qs. 15-18. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- PAEDUC
- Highest year school completed, father
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that your father (father substitute) finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did he ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did he complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If YES: How many years did he complete? Does he have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 96
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 97 | Not applicable | 526 |
| 98 | Don't know | 185 |
| 99 | Not available | 19 |
Column: 75
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Code exact grade or highest degree earned.
- MAEDUC
- Highest year school completed, mother
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that your mother (mother substitute) finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did she ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did she complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If YES: How many years did she complete? Does she have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 96
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 97 | Not applicable | 168 |
| 98 | Don't know | 178 |
| 99 | Not available | 21 |
Column: 77
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Code exact grade or highest degree earned.
- SPEDUC
- Highest year school completed, spouse
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that your spouse finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did (he/she) ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did (he/she) complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If YES: How many years did (he/she) complete? Does (he/she) have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 96
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 97 | Not applicable | 1496 |
| 98 | Don't know | 14 |
| 99 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 79
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Code exact grade or highest degree earned.
- DEGREE
- R's highest degree
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that you finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did you ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did you complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If YES: How many years did you complete? Do you have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Little high school | 400 |
| 1 | High school | 1485 |
| 2 | Junior college | 202 |
| 3 | Bachelor | 443 |
| 4 | Graduate | 230 |
| 7 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 5 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 81
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix D: Recodes, for a discussion of the original format of Qs. 19-22. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- PADEG
- Fathers highest degree
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that your father (father substitute) finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did he ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did he complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If YES: How many years did he complete? Does he have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Little high school | 814 |
| 1 | High school | 867 |
| 2 | Junior college | 68 |
| 3 | Bachelor | 208 |
| 4 | Graduate | 139 |
| 7 | Not applicable | 526 |
| 8 | Don't know | 129 |
| 9 | Not available | 14 |
Column: 82
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Code exact grade or highest degree earned.
- MADEG
- Mothers highest degree
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that your mother (mother substitute) finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did she ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did she complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If Yes: How many years did she complete? Does she have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Little high school | 779 |
| 1 | High school | 1289 |
| 2 | Junior college | 119 |
| 3 | Bachelor | 210 |
| 4 | Graduate | 80 |
| 7 | Not applicable | 168 |
| 8 | Don't know | 103 |
| 9 | Not available | 17 |
Column: 83
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Code exact grade or highest degree earned.
- SPDEG
- Spouses highest degree
Survey Question: What is the highest grade in elementary or high school that your spouse finished and got credit for? If finished 9th-12th grade or DK: Did (he/she) ever get a high school diploma or a GED certificate? Did (he/she) complete one or more years of college for credit -- not including schooling such as business college, technical or vocational school? If YES: How many years did (he/she) complete? Does (he/she) have any college degree? (If YES: What degree or degrees?)
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Little high school | 149 |
| 1 | High school | 653 |
| 2 | Junior college | 83 |
| 3 | Bachelor | 241 |
| 4 | Graduate | 135 |
| 7 | Not applicable | 1496 |
| 8 | Don't know | 8 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 84
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Code exact grade or highest degree earned.
- SEX
- Respondents sex
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Male | 1228 |
| 2 | Female | 1537 |
Column: 85
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Interviewer coded. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 9. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- RES16
- Type of place lived in when 16 yrs old
Survey Question: Which of the categories on this card comes closest to the type of place you were living in when you were 16 years old?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Country, nonfarm | 327 |
| 2 | Farm | 315 |
| 3 | Town lt 50,000 | 831 |
| 4 | 50,000 - 250,000 | 439 |
| 5 | Big-city suburb | 390 |
| 6 | City gt 250,000 | 459 |
| 8 | Don't know | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 86
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card C. REMARKS: Card C contained responses for Punches 1 to 6.
- REG16
- Region of residence, age 16
Survey Question: In what state or foreign country were you living when you were 16 years old?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Foreign | 195 |
| 1 | New England | 148 |
| 2 | Middle Atlantic | 443 |
| 3 | East North Central | 546 |
| 4 | West North Central | 215 |
| 5 | South Atlantic | 382 |
| 6 | East South Central | 202 |
| 7 | West South Central | 253 |
| 8 | Mountain | 117 |
| 9 | Pacific | 264 |
Column: 87
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Refer to region codes below and enter code numbers in box. New England = Main, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island. Middle Atlantic = New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania. East North Central = Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio. West North Central = Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas. South Atlantic = Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, District of Columbia. East South Central = Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi. West South Central = Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Texas. Mountain = Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico. Pacific = Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, Hawaii. REMARKS: See Appendix D: Recodes, for discussion of the recoding of the original question.
- MOBILE16
- Geographic mobility since age 16
Survey Question: When you were 16 years old, were you living in this same (city/town/county)?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Same city | 1153 |
| 2 | Same state, different city | 698 |
| 3 | Different state | 912 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 88
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if state named is same state lives in now. Refer to region codes below and enter code numbers in box. New England = Main, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island. Middle Atlantic = New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania. East North Central = Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio. West North Central = Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas. South Atlantic = Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, District of Columbia. East South Central = Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi. West South Central = Arkansas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Texas. Mountain = Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico. Pacific = Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, Hawaii. REMARKS: See Appendix D: Recodes, for discussion of the recoding of the original question.
- FAMILY16
- Living with parents when 16 yrs old
Survey Question: Were you living with both your own mother and father around the time you were 16? (If NO: "With whom were you living around that time?")(If R. married or left home by age 16, probe: "Before that.")
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Other | 80 |
| 1 | Mother & father | 1861 |
| 2 | Father & stepmother | 49 |
| 3 | Mother & stepfather | 179 |
| 4 | Father | 76 |
| 5 | Mother | 390 |
| 6 | Male relative | 13 |
| 7 | Female relative | 56 |
| 8 | And f relatives | 58 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 89
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Contents of Punches 6, 7, 0 in Col. 114 (Other, SPECIFY), and Punch 5 in Col. 115 (Other, SPECIFY) are available from NORC. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. If planning to perform trend analysis with FAMILY16, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- FAMDIF16
- Reason not living with parents
Survey Question: If not living with both own mother and father: What happened?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1861 |
| 1 | Parent died | 232 |
| 2 | Divorce, separated | 485 |
| 3 | Armed forces | 2 |
| 4 | Institution | 8 |
| 5 | Other | 166 |
| 8 | Don't know | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 8 |
Column: 90
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Contents of Punches 6, 7, 0 in Col. 114 (Other, SPECIFY), and Punch 5 in Col. 115 (Other, SPECIFY) are available from NORC. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- MAWRKGRW
- Mothers employment when R growing up
Survey Question: Did your mother ever work for pay for as long as a year, while you were growing up?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 169 |
| 1 | Yes | 1647 |
| 2 | No | 918 |
| 8 | Don't know | 14 |
| 9 | Not available | 17 |
Column: 91
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- INCOM16
- R's family income when 16 yrs old
Survey Question: Thinking about the time when you were 16 years old, compared with American families in general then, would you say your family income was -- far below average, below average, average, above average, or far above average? (PROBE: "Just your best guess.")
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Far below average | 151 |
| 2 | Below average | 432 |
| 3 | Average | 933 |
| 4 | Above average | 345 |
| 5 | Far above average | 36 |
| 7 | Lived in institution | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 844 |
Column: 92
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- BORN
- Was R born in this country
Survey Question: Were you born in this country?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Yes | 2503 |
| 2 | No | 256 |
| 8 | Don't know | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 94
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- PARBORN
- Were R's parents born in this country
Survey Question: Were both your parents born in this country?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Both in U.S | 2273 |
| 1 | Mother only | 86 |
| 2 | Father only | 72 |
| 3 | Mother; father don't know | 4 |
| 4 | Not mother; father don't know | 3 |
| 5 | Father; mother don't know | 1 |
| 6 | Not father; mother don't know | 0 |
| 7 | Don't know for both | 0 |
| 8 | Neither in U.S. | 314 |
| 9 | Not available | 12 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 0 |
Column: 95
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: If the respondent is uncertain of parent, use same persons as in Qs. 8, 16, 17, 20 and 21.
- GRANBORN
- How many grandparents born outside U.S.
Survey Question: Were all of your four grandparents born in this country? If NO ask: How many were born outside the United States?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | All in U.S | 1626 |
| 8 | Don't know | 14 |
| 9 | Not available | 8 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 134 |
Column: 97
Width: 2
Type: numeric
- HOMPOP
- Number of persons in household
Survey Question: [Total] Number of household members.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 0 |
| 99 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 99
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendices D and N for recodes an wording changes. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 3. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- BABIES
- Household members less than 6 yrs old
Survey Question: Number of members under 6 years old.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 8 | 8 or more | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 28 |
Column: 101
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendices D and N for recodes an wording changes. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 3. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- PRETEEN
- Household members 6 thru 12 yrs old
Survey Question: Number of members 6 to 12 years old.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 8 | 8 or more | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 28 |
Column: 102
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendices D and N for recodes an wording changes. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 3. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- TEENS
- Household members 13 thru 17 yrs old
Survey Question: Number of members 13 to 17 years old.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 8 | 8 or more | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 28 |
Column: 103
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendices D and N for recodes an wording changes. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 3. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- ADULTS
- Household members 18 yrs and older
Survey Question: Number of members over 17 years old.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 8 | 8 or more | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 104
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendices D and N for recodes an wording changes. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 3. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56. See Appendix A for use of 34D as weight.
- UNRELAT
- Number in household not related
Survey Question: Is everyone in the household related to you in some way? If NO: How many persons in the household are not related to you in any way?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 8 | 8 or more | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 881 |
Column: 105
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- EARNRS
- How many in family earned money
Survey Question: Just thinking about your family now -- those people in the household who are related to you ... How many persons in the family, including yourself, earned any money last year -- 2001 -- from any job or employment?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 7
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 8 | 8 or more | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 19 |
Column: 107
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- INCOME
- Total family income
Survey Question: In which of these groups did your total family income, from all sources, fall last year before taxes, that is? Just tell me the letter.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Less than $1000 | 45 |
| 2 | $1,000 - 2,999 | 26 |
| 3 | $3,000 - 3,999 | 29 |
| 4 | $4,000 - 4,999 | 20 |
| 5 | $5,000 - 5,999 | 26 |
| 6 | $6,000 - 6,999 | 30 |
| 7 | $7,000 - 7,999 | 30 |
| 8 | $8,000 - 9,999 | 71 |
| 9 | $10,000 - 14,999 | 183 |
| 10 | $15,000 - 19,999 | 167 |
| 11 | $20,000 - 24,999 | 183 |
| 12 | $25,000 or more | 1654 |
| 13 | Refused | 181 |
| 98 | Don't know | 120 |
| 99 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 108
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card D. REMARKS: Card D contained responses for Punches 01-12 only. See Qs. 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, and 46 for comparable questions in 1972, 1977, 1978, 1980 and 1982-1990. For 1972, 1977, 1978, 1980, and 1982-2000 income has been recoded from these questions to match the categories in Q.37. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- RINCOME
- Respondents income
Survey Question: Did you earn any income from (occupation described on Q2) in 2001? If YES: In which of these groups did your earnings from (occupation in Q2) for last year -- 2001 -- fall? That is, before taxes or other deductions. Just tell me the letter.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 833 |
| 1 | Less than $1,000 | 44 |
| 2 | $1,000 - 2,999 | 69 |
| 3 | $3,000 - 3,999 | 37 |
| 4 | $4,000 - 4,999 | 24 |
| 5 | $5,000 - 5,999 | 37 |
| 6 | $6,000 - 6,999 | 20 |
| 7 | $7,000 - 7,999 | 26 |
| 8 | $8,000 - 9,999 | 60 |
| 9 | $10,000 - 14,999 | 163 |
| 10 | $15,000 - 19,999 | 155 |
| 11 | $20,000 - 24,999 | 181 |
| 12 | $25,000 or more | 961 |
| 13 | Refused | 98 |
| 98 | Don't know | 35 |
| 99 | Not available | 22 |
Column: 110
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card E. REMARKS: Card E contained responses for Punches 01-12 only. Q.38 responses are not in these data, but are contained in Q.38A. See Qs. 41, 43, 45 and 47 for comparable questions in 1977, 1978-1980, 1982-2000 surveys.
- INCOME98
- Total family income
Survey Question: Family income on the 1998, 2000 surveys. For question wording, see Q.37.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Under $1,000 | 39 |
| 2 | $1,000 - 2,999 | 26 |
| 3 | $3,000 - 3,999 | 30 |
| 4 | $4,000 - 4,999 | 18 |
| 5 | $5,000 - 5,999 | 27 |
| 6 | $6,000 - 6,999 | 30 |
| 7 | $7,000 - 7,999 | 29 |
| 8 | $8,000 - 9,999 | 71 |
| 9 | $10,000 - 12,499 | 99 |
| 10 | $12,500 - 14,999 | 85 |
| 11 | $15,000 - 17,499 | 86 |
| 12 | $17,500 - 19,999 | 82 |
| 13 | $20,000 - 22,499 | 93 |
| 14 | $22,500 - 24,999 | 91 |
| 15 | $25,000 - 29,999 | 141 |
| 16 | $30,000 - 34,999 | 173 |
| 17 | $35,000 - 39,999 | 150 |
| 18 | $40,000 - 49,999 | 245 |
| 19 | $50,000 - 59,999 | 219 |
| 20 | $60,000 - 74,999 | 218 |
| 21 | $75,000 - $89,999 | 167 |
| 22 | $90,000 - $109,999 | 114 |
| 23 | $110,000 or over | 230 |
| 24 | Refused | 181 |
| 98 | Don't know | 120 |
| 99 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 112
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Hand Card O. REMARKS: Card O contained responses for Punches 01-20 only. For comparable questions in 1972-90, 98 see Qs. 37, 39, 40 and 42.
- RINCOM98
- Respondents income
Survey Question: Respondent's income on the 1998, 2000 surveys. For question wording, see Q.38.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 828 |
| 1 | Under $1,000 | 44 |
| 2 | $1,000 - 2,999 | 69 |
| 3 | $3,000 - 3,999 | 37 |
| 4 | $4,000 - 4,999 | 24 |
| 5 | $5,000 - 5,999 | 37 |
| 6 | $6,000 - 6,999 | 20 |
| 7 | $7,000 - 7,999 | 26 |
| 8 | $8,000 - 9,999 | 60 |
| 9 | $10,000 - 12,499 | 78 |
| 10 | $12,500 - 14,999 | 85 |
| 11 | $15,000 - 17,499 | 69 |
| 12 | $17,500 - 19,999 | 86 |
| 13 | $20,000 - 22,499 | 100 |
| 14 | $22,500 - 24,999 | 81 |
| 15 | $25,000 - 29,999 | 140 |
| 16 | $30,000 - 34,999 | 166 |
| 17 | $35,000 - 39,999 | 123 |
| 18 | $40,000 - 49,999 | 170 |
| 19 | $50,000 - 59,999 | 136 |
| 20 | $60,000 - 74,999 | 95 |
| 21 | $75,000 - $89,999 | 41 |
| 22 | $90,000 - $109,999 | 23 |
| 23 | $110,000 over | 70 |
| 24 | Refused | 95 |
| 98 | Don't know | 35 |
| 99 | Not available | 27 |
Column: 114
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card P. REMARKS: Hand Card P contained response options 1-23.
- WEEKSWRK
- Weeks R worked last year
Survey Question: Now I'd like to ask you about last year. In 2001 how many weeks did you work either full-time or part-time not counting work around the house -- include paid vacations and sick leave?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 13 |
| 99 | Not available | 3 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 0 |
Column: 116
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: WEEKSWRK is coded in two digits. The collapsed numbers above are for convenience of display only.
- PARTFULL
- Was R's work part-time or full-time
Survey Question: When you worked in 2001, was it usually full- or part-time?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 712 |
| 1 | Full-time | 1619 |
| 2 | Part-time | 427 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 6 |
Column: 118
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: The collapsed numbers above are for convenience of display only.
- REGION
- Region of interview
Survey Question: Region of interview.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not assigned | 0 |
| 1 | New England | 158 |
| 2 | Middle Atlantic | 435 |
| 3 | East North Central | 461 |
| 4 | West North Central | 223 |
| 5 | South Atlantic | 486 |
| 6 | East South Central | 199 |
| 7 | West South Central | 272 |
| 8 | Mountain | 165 |
| 9 | Pacific | 366 |
Column: 119
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: See Q.26 for a listing of states within regions, or refer to "Statistical Abstract" (any edition), published by U.S. Bureau of the Census, for this information.
- XNORCSIZ
- Expanded N.O.R.C. size code
Survey Question: NORC size of place.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not assigned | 0 |
| 1 | City gt 250,000 | 485 |
| 2 | City, 50-250,000 | 386 |
| 3 | Suburb, large city | 590 |
| 4 | Suburb, med city | 442 |
| 5 | Uninc, large city | 79 |
| 6 | Uninc, medium city | 54 |
| 7 | City, 10-49,999 | 229 |
| 8 | Town gt 2500 | 171 |
| 9 | Smaller areas | 241 |
| 10 | Open country | 88 |
Column: 120
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 4.
- SRCBELT
- SRC beltcode
Survey Question: SRC (Survey Research Center, University of Michigan) new belt code.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not assigned | 0 |
| 1 | 12 lrgst smsa's | 213 |
| 2 | SMSA's 13-100 | 411 |
| 3 | Suburb, 12 lrgst | 333 |
| 4 | Suburb, 13-100 | 376 |
| 5 | Other urban | 1146 |
| 6 | Other rural | 286 |
Column: 122
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: The SRC belt code is described in Appendix D: Recodes. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 4.
- SIZE
- Size of place in 1,000s
Survey Question: Size of Place.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 9999
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| -1 | Not assigned | 0 |
Column: 123
Width: 4
Type: numeric
Text: This code is the population to the nearest 1,000 of the smallest civil division listed by the U.S. Census (city, town, other incorporated area over 1,000 in population, township, division, etc.) which encompasses the segment. If a segment falls into more than one locality, the following rules apply in determining the locality for which the rounded population figure is coded. If the predominance of the listings for any segment are in one of the localities, the rounded population of that locality is coded. If the listings are distributed equally over localities in the segment, and the localities are all cities, towns, or villages, the rounded population of the larger city or town is coded. The same is true if the localities are all rural townships or divisions. If the listings are distributed equally over localities in the segment and the localities include a town or village and a rural township or division, the rounded population of the town or village is coded. The source of the data is the 1970 U.S. Census population figures published in the PC(1)-A series, Tables 6 and 10. For cases from the 1980 and 1990 frames analogous tables from the 1980 and 1990 Censuses were used. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- PARTYID
- Political party affiliation
Survey Question: Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a Republican, Democrat, Independent, or what?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Strong Democrat | 408 |
| 1 | Not strong Democrat | 515 |
| 2 | Independent, near Democrat | 267 |
| 3 | Independent | 528 |
| 4 | Independent, near Republican | 199 |
| 5 | Not strong Republican | 449 |
| 6 | Strong Republican | 315 |
| 7 | Other party | 48 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 36 |
Column: 127
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: See Appendix D: Recodes, for original question format and method of recoding. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- VOTE96
- Did R vote in 1996 election
Survey Question: In 1996, you remember that Clinton ran for President on the Democratic ticket against Dole for the Republicans and Perot for the Reform Party. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Voted | 1734 |
| 2 | Did not vote | 657 |
| 3 | Ineligible | 340 |
| 4 | Refused to answer | 13 |
| 8 | Don't know/remember | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 128
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- PRES96
- Vote for Clinton, Dole, Perot
Survey Question: If voted: Did you vote for Clinton, Dole, or Perot?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1031 |
| 1 | Clinton | 1008 |
| 2 | Dole | 475 |
| 3 | Perot | 197 |
| 4 | Other (specify) | 18 |
| 6 | Didn't vote | 10 |
| 8 | Don't know | 7 |
| 9 | Not available | 19 |
Column: 129
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- IF96WHO
- Who would R have voted for -- 1996 election
Survey Question: If did not vote or ineligible: Who would you have voted for, for President, if you had voted?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1742 |
| 1 | Clinton | 492 |
| 2 | Dole | 140 |
| 3 | Perot | 95 |
| 4 | Other | 117 |
| 8 | Don't know/remember | 66 |
| 9 | Not available | 113 |
Column: 130
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- VOTE00
- Did R vote in 2000 election
Survey Question: [In 2000, you remember that Gore ran for President on the Democratic ticket against Bush for the Republicans and Nader for the Green Party. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Voted | 1780 |
| 2 | Did not vote | 822 |
| 3 | Ineligible | 138 |
| 4 | Refused to answer | 11 |
| 8 | Don't know/remember | 14 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 131
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- PRES00
- Vote for Gore, Bush, Nader
Survey Question: [If voted: Did you vote for Gore, Bush, or Nader?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 985 |
| 1 | Gore | 781 |
| 2 | Bush | 885 |
| 3 | Nader | 57 |
| 4 | Other (specify) | 16 |
| 6 | Didn't vote | 10 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 25 |
Column: 132
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- IF00WHO
- Who would R have voted for in 2000 election
Survey Question: [If did not vote or ineligible: Who would you have voted for, for President, if you had voted?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1770 |
| 1 | Gore | 350 |
| 2 | Bush | 382 |
| 3 | Nader | 26 |
| 4 | Other | 123 |
| 8 | Don't know/remember | 66 |
| 9 | Not available | 48 |
Column: 133
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- POLVIEWS
- Think of self as liberal or conservative
Survey Question: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. I'm going to show you a seven point scale on which the political views that people might hold are arranged from extremely liberal -- point 1 -- to extremely conservative -- point 7. Where would you place yourself on this scale?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Extremely liberal | 47 |
| 2 | Liberal | 143 |
| 3 | Slightly liberal | 159 |
| 4 | Moderate | 522 |
| 5 | Slightly conservative | 209 |
| 6 | Conservative | 210 |
| 7 | Extremely conservative | 41 |
| 8 | Don't know | 36 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 134
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card Q. REMARKS: Card Q contained responses for Punches 1 through 7. Q.65 was asked on both Form 1 and Form 2 at different points in the interview in 1978. See App. B for locations in the questionnaire. Q.65 appeared only on Form 1 in 1983. See Q.65.
- NATSPAC
- Space exploration program
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we're spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. First: Space exploration program, are we spending too much, too little or about the right amount on the space exploration program?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 150 |
| 2 | About right | 640 |
| 3 | Too much | 479 |
| 8 | Don't know | 87 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 135
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATENVIR
- Improving & protecting environment
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we're spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Improving and protecting the environment, are we spending too much, too little or about the right amount on improving and protecting the environment?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 793 |
| 2 | About right | 439 |
| 3 | Too much | 90 |
| 8 | Don't know | 33 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 136
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATHEAL
- Improving & protecting nations health
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we're spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Improving and protecting the nation's health, are we spending too much, too little or about the right amount on improving and protecting the nations health?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 1000 |
| 2 | About right | 284 |
| 3 | Too much | 52 |
| 8 | Don't know | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 137
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATCITY
- Solving problems of big cities
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we're spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Solving the problems of the big cities, are we spending too much, too little or about the right amount on solving the problems of the big cities?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 562 |
| 2 | About right | 494 |
| 3 | Too much | 183 |
| 8 | Don't know | 116 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 138
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATCRIME
- Halting rising crime rate
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we're spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Halting the rising crime rate, are we spending too much, too little or about the right amount halting the rising crime rate?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 758 |
| 2 | About right | 473 |
| 3 | Too much | 90 |
| 8 | Don't know | 35 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 139
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATDRUG
- Dealing with drug addiction
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we're spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Dealing with drug addiction, are we spending too much, too little or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 774 |
| 2 | About right | 409 |
| 3 | Too much | 127 |
| 8 | Don't know | 44 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 140
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATEDUC
- Improving nations education system
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Improving the nation's education system, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 992 |
| 2 | About right | 278 |
| 3 | Too much | 73 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 141
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATRACE
- Improving the conditions of blacks
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Improving the conditions of Blacks, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 412 |
| 2 | About right | 617 |
| 3 | Too much | 230 |
| 8 | Don't know | 87 |
| 9 | Not available | 12 |
Column: 142
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATARMS
- Military, armaments, and defense
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. The military, armaments and defense, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 414 |
| 2 | About right | 615 |
| 3 | Too much | 295 |
| 8 | Don't know | 33 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 143
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATAID
- Foreign aid
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Foreign aid, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 88 |
| 2 | About right | 365 |
| 3 | Too much | 860 |
| 8 | Don't know | 42 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 144
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATFARE
- Welfare
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Welfare, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 279 |
| 2 | About right | 502 |
| 3 | Too much | 533 |
| 8 | Don't know | 41 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 145
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATROAD
- Highways and bridges
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Highways and bridges, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Too little | 950 |
| 2 | About right | 1377 |
| 3 | Too much | 337 |
| 8 | Don't know | 98 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 146
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATSOC
- Social security
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Social security, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Too little | 1618 |
| 2 | About right | 920 |
| 3 | Too much | 123 |
| 8 | Don't know | 99 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 147
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATMASS
- Mass transportation
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Mass transportation, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Too little | 960 |
| 2 | About right | 1361 |
| 3 | Too much | 277 |
| 8 | Don't know | 158 |
| 9 | Not available | 9 |
Column: 148
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATPARK
- Parks and recreation
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Parks and recreation, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Too little | 940 |
| 2 | About right | 1598 |
| 3 | Too much | 147 |
| 8 | Don't know | 76 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 149
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATCHLD
- Assistance for childcare
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Assistance for child care, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Too little | 1533 |
| 2 | About right | 861 |
| 3 | Too much | 199 |
| 8 | Don't know | 166 |
| 9 | Not available | 6 |
Column: 150
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.66 A-K appeared only on Form 1 in 1984-1989. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 30, 33, 54, and 81.
- NATSCI
- Supporting scientific research
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Supporting scientific research, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1407 |
| 1 | Too little | 461 |
| 2 | About right | 629 |
| 3 | Too much | 176 |
| 8 | Don't know | 87 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 151
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- NATSPACY
- Space exploration -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Space exploration, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on space exploration?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 163 |
| 2 | About right | 647 |
| 3 | Too much | 521 |
| 8 | Don't know | 74 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 152
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATENVIY
- The environment -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. The environment, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 877 |
| 2 | About right | 368 |
| 3 | Too much | 123 |
| 8 | Don't know | 37 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 153
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATHEALY
- Health -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Health, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 1026 |
| 2 | About right | 265 |
| 3 | Too much | 95 |
| 8 | Don't know | 18 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 154
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATCITYY
- Assistance to big cities -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Assistance to big cities, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 221 |
| 2 | About right | 579 |
| 3 | Too much | 453 |
| 8 | Don't know | 148 |
| 9 | Not available | 6 |
Column: 155
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATCRIMY
- Law enforcement -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Law enforcement, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 663 |
| 2 | About right | 568 |
| 3 | Too much | 142 |
| 8 | Don't know | 30 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 156
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATDRUGY
- Drug rehabilitation -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Drug rehabilitation, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 715 |
| 2 | About right | 425 |
| 3 | Too much | 176 |
| 8 | Don't know | 85 |
| 9 | Not available | 6 |
Column: 157
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATEDUCY
- Education -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Education, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 1072 |
| 2 | About right | 252 |
| 3 | Too much | 66 |
| 8 | Don't know | 15 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 158
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATRACEY
- Assistance to blacks -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Assistance to Blacks, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 338 |
| 2 | About right | 591 |
| 3 | Too much | 334 |
| 8 | Don't know | 133 |
| 9 | Not available | 11 |
Column: 159
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATARMSY
- National defense -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. National defense, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 477 |
| 2 | About right | 591 |
| 3 | Too much | 280 |
| 8 | Don't know | 57 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 160
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATAIDY
- Assistance to other countries -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Assistance to other countries, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 123 |
| 2 | About right | 276 |
| 3 | Too much | 966 |
| 8 | Don't know | 38 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 161
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- NATFAREY
- Assistance to the poor -- version y
Survey Question: We are faced with many problems in this country, none of which can be solved easily or inexpensively. I'm going to name some of these problems, and for each one I'd like you to tell me whether you think we are spending too much money on it, too little money, or about the right amount. Assistance to the poor, are we spending too much, too little, or about the right amount on it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1358 |
| 1 | Too little | 922 |
| 2 | About right | 344 |
| 3 | Too much | 109 |
| 8 | Don't know | 30 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 162
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Q.67 appeared on Form 2 in 1984-1986, 1988-1996, and on Forms 2 and 3 in 1987. It is a variant of Q.66. See also Q.68. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report Nos. 29 and 33.
- EQWLTH
- Should govt reduce income differences
Survey Question: Some people think that the government in Washington ought to reduce the income differences between the rich and the poor, perhaps by raising the taxes of wealthy families or by giving income assistance to the poor. Others think that the government should not concern itself with reducing this income difference between the rich and the poor. Here is a card with a scale from 1 to 7. Think of a score of 1 as meaning that the government ought to reduce the income differences between rich and poor, and a score of 7 meaning that the government should not concern itself with reducing income differences. What score between 1 and 7 comes closest to the way you feel?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Government reduce differences | 175 |
| 7 | No government action | 109 |
| 8 | Don't know | 11 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 163
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Circle one. Hand [respondent] Card V. REMARKS: Card V contained responses for Punches 1-7.
- TAX
- R's federal income tax
Survey Question: Do you consider the amount of federal income tax which you have to pay as too high, about right, or too low?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Too high | 546 |
| 2 | About right | 345 |
| 3 | Too low | 9 |
| 4 | R pays none (vol) | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 24 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 164
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: In 1976, this question was asked immediately before Q.67 (spending priorities) for half of the sample with Form 1. For the half with Form 2, this question immediately followed Q.67. See Q.248 for the split-ballot forms. See Appendix N for across survey changes. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- SPKATH
- Allow anti-religionist to speak
Survey Question: There are always some people whose ideas are considered bad or dangerous by other people. For instance, somebody who is against all churches and religion ... If such a person wanted to make a speech in your (city/town/community) against churches and religion, should he be allowed to speak, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Allowed | 710 |
| 2 | Not allowed | 206 |
| 8 | Don't know | 8 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 165
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- COLATH
- Allow anti-religionist to teach
Survey Question: There are always some people whose ideas are considered bad or dangerous by other people. For instance, somebody who is against all churches and religion ... Should such a person be allowed to teach in a college or university, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 4 | Allowed | 556 |
| 5 | Not allowed | 350 |
| 8 | Don't know | 17 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 166
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- LIBATH
- Allow anti-religious book in library
Survey Question: There are always some people whose ideas are considered bad or dangerous by other people. For instance, somebody who is against all churches and religion ... If some people in your community suggested that a book he wrote against churches and religion should be taken out of your public library, would you favor removing this book, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Remove | 226 |
| 2 | Not remove | 672 |
| 8 | Don't know | 23 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 167
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- SPKRAC
- Allow racist to speak
Survey Question: Or consider a person who believes that Blacks are genetically inferior. If such a person wanted to make a speech in your community claiming that Blacks are inferior, should he be allowed to speak, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Allowed | 578 |
| 2 | Not allowed | 322 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 168
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- COLRAC
- Allow racist to teach
Survey Question: Or consider a person who believes that Blacks are genetically inferior. Should such a person be allowed to teach in a college or university, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 4 | Allowed | 481 |
| 5 | Not allowed | 428 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 169
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- LIBRAC
- Allow racists book in library
Survey Question: If some people in your community suggested that a book he wrote which said Blacks are inferior should be taken out of your public library, would you favor removing this book, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Remove | 294 |
| 2 | Not remove | 602 |
| 8 | Don't know | 23 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 170
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- SPKCOM
- Allow communist to speak
Survey Question: Now, I should like to ask you some questions about a man who admits he is a Communist. Suppose this admitted Communist wanted to make a speech in your community. Should he be allowed to speak, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Allowed | 636 |
| 2 | Not allowed | 266 |
| 8 | Don't know | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 171
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- COLCOM
- Should communist teacher be fired
Survey Question: Now, I should like to ask you some questions about a man who admits he is a Communist. Suppose he is teaching in a college. Should he be fired, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 4 | Fired | 338 |
| 5 | Not fired | 549 |
| 8 | Don't know | 35 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 172
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- LIBCOM
- Allow communists book in library
Survey Question: Now, I should like to ask you some questions about a man who admits he is a Communist. Suppose he wrote a book which is in your public library. Somebody in your community suggests that the book should be removed from the library. Would you favor removing it, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Remove | 263 |
| 2 | Not remove | 636 |
| 8 | Don't know | 22 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 173
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SPKMIL
- Allow militarist to speak
Survey Question: Consider a person who advocates doing away with elections and letting the military run the country. If such a person wanted to make a speech in your community, should he be allowed to speak, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Allowed | 635 |
| 2 | Not allowed | 276 |
| 8 | Don't know | 12 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 174
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- COLMIL
- Allow militarist to teach
Survey Question: Consider a person who advocates doing away with elections and letting the military run the country. Should such a person be allowed to teach in a college or university, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 4 | Allowed | 510 |
| 5 | Not allowed | 391 |
| 8 | Don't know | 22 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 175
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- LIBMIL
- Allow militarists book in library
Survey Question: Consider a person who advocates doing away with elections and letting the military run the country. Suppose he wrote a book advocating doing away with elections and letting the military run the country. Somebody in your community suggests that the book be removed from the public library. Would you favor removing it, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Remove | 256 |
| 2 | Not remove | 642 |
| 8 | Don't know | 24 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 176
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SPKHOMO
- Allow homosexual to speak
Survey Question: And what about a man who admits that he is a homosexual? Suppose this admitted homosexual wanted to make a speech in your community. Should he be allowed to speak, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Allowed | 772 |
| 2 | Not allowed | 138 |
| 8 | Don't know | 11 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 177
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- COLHOMO
- Allow homosexual to teach
Survey Question: And what about a man who admits that he is a homosexual? Should such a person be allowed to teach in a college or university, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 4 | Allowed | 722 |
| 5 | Not allowed | 178 |
| 8 | Don't know | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 178
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- LIBHOMO
- Allow homosexuals book in library
Survey Question: And what about a man who admits that he is a homosexual? If some people in your community suggested that a book he wrote in favor of homosexuality should be taken out of your public library, would you favor removing this book, or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Remove | 206 |
| 2 | Not remove | 694 |
| 8 | Don't know | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 179
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- CAPPUN
- Favor or oppose death penalty for murder
Survey Question: Are you in favor of the death penalty for persons convicted of murder?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Favor | 899 |
| 2 | Oppose | 409 |
| 8 | Don't know | 57 |
| 9 | Not available | 7 |
Column: 180
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- GUNLAW
- Favor or oppose gun permits
Survey Question: Would you favor or oppose a law which would require a person to obtain a police permit before he or she could buy a gun?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Favor | 737 |
| 2 | Oppose | 179 |
| 8 | Don't know | 7 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 181
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- COURTS
- Courts dealing with criminals
Survey Question: In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Too harsh | 126 |
| 2 | Not harsh enough | 919 |
| 3 | About right | 240 |
| 8 | Don't know | 83 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 182
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- GRASS
- Should marijuana be made legal
Survey Question: Do you think the use of marijuana should be made legal or not?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Legal | 306 |
| 2 | Not legal | 545 |
| 8 | Don't know | 61 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 183
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Q.95 was asked on both Form 1 and Form 2 at different points in the interview in 1978. See App. B for locations in the questionnaire.
- USWARY
- Expect U.S. in world war in 10 years
Survey Question: Do you expect the United States to fight in another world war within the next ten years?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 575 |
| 2 | No | 269 |
| 8 | Don't know | 64 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 184
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Q.98 appeared on Form 2 in 1976 and 1985. It is a variant of Q.97. See Q.248 for discussion of the split-half questions and sample design.
- RELIG
- R's religious preference
Survey Question: What is your religious preference? Is it Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, some other religion, or no religion?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Protestant | 1460 |
| 2 | Catholic | 673 |
| 3 | Jewish | 48 |
| 4 | None | 379 |
| 5 | Other (specify) | 22 |
| 6 | Buddhism | 21 |
| 7 | Hinduism | 6 |
| 8 | Other eastern | 2 |
| 9 | Muslim/Islam | 13 |
| 10 | Orthodox-Christian | 23 |
| 11 | Christian | 65 |
| 12 | Native American | 4 |
| 13 | Inter-nondenominational | 30 |
| 98 | Don't know | 4 |
| 99 | Not available | 15 |
Column: 185
Width: 2
Type: numeric
- DENOM
- Specific denomination
Survey Question: What specific denomination is that, if any?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1290 |
| 10 | Am Baptist Asso | 34 |
| 11 | Am Bapt Ch in USA | 18 |
| 12 | Nat Bapt Conv of Am | 10 |
| 13 | Nat Bapt Conv USA | 4 |
| 14 | Southern Baptist | 208 |
| 15 | Other Baptists | 22 |
| 18 | Baptist -- don't know which | 186 |
| 20 | Afr Meth Episcopal | 11 |
| 21 | Afr Meth Ep Zion | 2 |
| 22 | United Methodist | 158 |
| 23 | Other Methodist | 1 |
| 28 | Methodist -- don't know which | 34 |
| 30 | Am Lutheran | 29 |
| 31 | Luth Ch in America | 15 |
| 32 | Lutheran -- Mo Synod | 34 |
| 33 | Wi Evan Luth Synod | 11 |
| 34 | Other Lutheran | 2 |
| 35 | Evangelical Luth | 6 |
| 38 | Lutheran -- don't know which | 52 |
| 40 | Presbyterian C in US | 16 |
| 41 | United Pres Ch in US | 15 |
| 42 | Other Presbyterian | 3 |
| 43 | Presbyterian, merged | 3 |
| 48 | Presbyterian -- don't know wh | 42 |
| 50 | Episcopal | 58 |
| 60 | Other | 338 |
| 70 | No denomination | 138 |
| 98 | Don't know | 8 |
| 99 | Not available | 17 |
Column: 187
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if Protestant. Probe for exact denomination. REMARKS: Q.104, Col. 393-394, Punch 5 (Other, SPECIFY), is available from NORC. Q.104A, Cols. 395-396, Punch 60 (N = 4957), recoded into Cols. 397-399 [OTHER]. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56. See Appendix K: Protestant denominations. See Appendix N for changes across surveys.
- OTHER
- Other Protestant denominations
Survey Question: What specific denomination is that, if any? Other Protestant denominations
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 997
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2410 |
| 998 | Don't know | 14 |
| 999 | Not available | 22 |
Column: 189
Width: 3
Type: numeric
- JEW
- What sort of Jew is R
Survey Question: Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or none of these?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2702 |
| 1 | Orthodox | 4 |
| 2 | Conservative | 7 |
| 3 | Reform | 23 |
| 4 | None of these | 13 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 15 |
Column: 192
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if Jewish. Probe for exact denomination.
- FUND
- How fundamentalist is R currently
Survey Question: Fundamentalism/liberalism of respondent's religion.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Fundamentalist | 756 |
| 2 | Moderate | 992 |
| 3 | Liberal | 772 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available -- excluded | 245 |
Column: 193
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 43. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- ATTEND
- How often R attends religious services
Survey Question: How often do you attend religious services?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Never | 513 |
| 1 | Less than once a year | 194 |
| 2 | Once a year | 385 |
| 3 | Several times a year | 357 |
| 4 | Once a month | 188 |
| 5 | 2-3x a month | 258 |
| 6 | Nearly every week | 180 |
| 7 | Every week | 455 |
| 8 | More than once week | 213 |
| 9 | Don't know, not available | 22 |
Column: 194
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Use categories as probes, if necessary. REMARKS: See GSS Methodological Report No. 88.
- RELITEN
- Strength of affiliation
Survey Question: Would you call yourself a strong (preference named in Q104 or 104-A) or a not very strong (preference named in Q104 or 104-A?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Strong | 1010 |
| 2 | Not very strong | 1041 |
| 3 | Somewhat strong | 308 |
| 4 | No religion | 383 |
| 8 | Don't know | 8 |
| 9 | Not available | 15 |
Column: 195
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask everyone with any religious preference named in Q104.
- POSTLIFE
- Belief in life after death
Survey Question: Do you believe there is a life after death?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Yes | 975 |
| 2 | No | 236 |
| 8 | Don't know | 151 |
| 9 | Not available | 10 |
Column: 196
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- PRAY
- How often does R pray
Survey Question: About how often do you pray?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Several times a day | 348 |
| 2 | Once a day | 424 |
| 3 | Several times a week | 154 |
| 4 | Once a week | 117 |
| 5 | Less than once a week | 302 |
| 6 | Never | 7 |
| 8 | Don't know | 10 |
| 9 | Not available | 10 |
Column: 197
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Use categories as probes. REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- RELIG16
- Religion in which raised
Survey Question: In what religion were you raised?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Protestant | 1553 |
| 2 | Catholic | 821 |
| 3 | Jewish | 56 |
| 4 | None | 195 |
| 5 | Other (specify) | 8 |
| 6 | Buddhism | 13 |
| 7 | Hinduism | 5 |
| 8 | Other eastern | 1 |
| 9 | Muslim/Islam | 14 |
| 10 | Orthodox-Christian | 26 |
| 11 | Christian | 38 |
| 12 | Native American | 1 |
| 13 | Inter-nondenominational | 13 |
| 98 | Don't know | 6 |
| 99 | Not available | 15 |
Column: 198
Width: 2
Type: numeric
- DENOM16
- Denomination in which R was raised
Survey Question: What specific denomination is that, if any?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1197 |
| 10 | Am Baptist Asso | 40 |
| 11 | Am Bapt Ch in USA | 16 |
| 12 | Nat Bapt Conv of Am | 10 |
| 13 | Nat Bapt Conv USA | 5 |
| 14 | Southern Baptist | 243 |
| 15 | Other Baptists | 24 |
| 18 | Baptist -- don't know which | 229 |
| 20 | Afr Meth Episcopal | 9 |
| 21 | Afr Meth Ep Zion | 1 |
| 22 | United Methodist | 167 |
| 23 | Other Methodist | 1 |
| 28 | Methodist -- don't know which | 62 |
| 30 | Am Lutheran | 31 |
| 31 | Luth Ch in America | 15 |
| 32 | Lutheran -- Mo Synod | 36 |
| 33 | Wi Evan Luth Synod | 9 |
| 34 | Other Lutheran | 7 |
| 35 | Evangelical Luth | 9 |
| 38 | Lutheran -- don't know which | 68 |
| 40 | Presbyterian C in US | 21 |
| 41 | United Pres Ch in US | 18 |
| 42 | Other Presbyterian | 4 |
| 43 | Presbyterian, merged | 5 |
| 48 | Presbyterian -- don't know wh | 56 |
| 50 | Episcopal | 70 |
| 60 | Other | 317 |
| 70 | No denomination | 69 |
| 98 | Don't know | 6 |
| 99 | Not available | 20 |
Column: 200
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if Protestant. Probe for exact denomination. REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- OTH16
- Other Protestant denominations
Survey Question: What specific denomination is that, if any? Other Protestant denominations.
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 1
Maximum value= 997
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2428 |
| 998 | Don't know | 2 |
| 999 | Not available | 27 |
Column: 202
Width: 3
Type: numeric
- JEW16
- What sort of Jew R was at age 16
Survey Question: Were you Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or none of these?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2694 |
| 1 | Orthodox | 4 |
| 2 | Conservative | 17 |
| 3 | Reform | 26 |
| 4 | None of these | 8 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 15 |
Column: 205
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if Jewish. Probe for exact denomination
- FUND16
- How fundamentalist was R at age 16
Survey Question: Fundamentalism/liberalism of religion respondent raised in.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Fundamentalist | 834 |
| 2 | Moderate | 1101 |
| 3 | Liberal | 665 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available -- excluded | 165 |
Column: 206
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 43. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- PRAYER
- Bible prayer in public schools
Survey Question: The United States Supreme Court has ruled that no state or local government may require the reading of the Lord's Prayer or Bible verses in public schools. What are your views on this -- do you approve or disapprove of the court ruling?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Approve | 341 |
| 2 | Disapprove | 518 |
| 8 | Don't know | 49 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 207
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- BIBLE
- Feelings about the Bible
Survey Question: Which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? a. The Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word ... b. The Bible is the inspired word of God but not everything in it should be taken literally, word for word ... c. The Bible is an ancient book of fables, legends, history, and moral precepts recorded by men.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Word of God | 390 |
| 2 | Inspired word | 727 |
| 3 | Book of fables | 192 |
| 4 | Other | 36 |
| 8 | Don't know | 24 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 208
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Circle only one code. Hand [respondent] Card AF. REMARKS: Card AF contained Punches 1-3. Q.120A appeared on Forms 1 and 2 in 1984 and 1987 and Form 1 in 1985. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 30. See Appendix P.
- WORLD1
- World image: much evil vs. much good
Survey Question: People have different images of the world and human nature. We'd like to know the kinds of images you have. Here is a card with sets of contrasting images. On a scale of 1-7 where would you place your image of the world and human nature between the two contrasting images?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | World is evil | 38 |
| 7 | World is good | 148 |
| 8 | Don't know | 14 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 209
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AH. REMARKS: Card AH contained items A-G with seven-point scales as presented above.
- RACMAR
- Favor law against racial intermarriage
Survey Question: Do you think there should be laws against marriages between (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) and Whites?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 88 |
| 2 | No | 828 |
| 8 | Don't know | 7 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 210
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 22.
- RACPUSH
- Blacks shouldn't push
Survey Question: Here are some opinions other people have expressed in connection with (Negro/Black)-White relations. Which statement on the card comes closest to how you, yourself, feel? The first one is ... (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) shouldn't push themselves where they're not wanted.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Agree strongly | 126 |
| 2 | Agree slightly | 178 |
| 3 | Disagree slightly | 225 |
| 4 | Disagree strongly | 317 |
| 8 | Don't know | 74 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 211
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AJ. REMARKS: Card AJ contained the responses for Punches 1-4. Q.127A appeared only on Form 1 in 1985. See Appendix N for across survey changes. See Appendix P.
- RACLIVE
- Any opp. race in neighborhood
Survey Question: Are there any (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) living in this neighborhood now?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1395 |
| 1 | Yes | 933 |
| 2 | No | 365 |
| 8 | Don't know | 49 |
| 9 | Not available | 23 |
Column: 212
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes. Note especially changes in 1987. If planning to perform trend analysis with these variables, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- AFFRMACT
- Favor preference in hiring blacks
Survey Question: Some people say that because of past discrimination, Blacks should be given preference in hiring and promotion. Others say that such preference in hiring and promotion of Blacks is wrong because it discriminates against Whites. What about your opinion -- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of Blacks? [If favors:] Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? [If opposes:] Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly support preference | 84 |
| 2 | Support preference | 58 |
| 3 | Oppose preference | 249 |
| 4 | Strongly oppose preference | 492 |
| 8 | Don't know | 22 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 213
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Qs. 153, 153AA, and 153AB are recoded into a single variable.
- WRKWAYUP
- Blacks overcome prejudice without favors
Survey Question: Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with the following statement: Irish, Italians, Jewish and many other minorities overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks should do the same without special favors.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Agree strongly | 422 |
| 2 | Agree somewhat | 238 |
| 3 | Neither agree nor disagree | 115 |
| 4 | Disagree somewhat | 69 |
| 5 | Disagree strongly | 50 |
| 8 | Don't know | 10 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 214
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AL. REMARKS: Qs. 153, 153AA, and 153AB are recoded into a single variable. Hand Card AL contained responses 1-5
- BLKSIMP
- Have conditions for blacks improved
Survey Question: In the past few years, do you think conditions for black people have improved, gotten worse, or stayed about the same?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Improved | 592 |
| 2 | Gotten worse | 34 |
| 3 | About the same | 262 |
| 8 | Don't know | 20 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 215
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- CLOSEBLK
- How close feel to blacks
Survey Question: In general, how close do you feel to Blacks?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 8
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Not at all close | 50 |
| 5 | Neither one or the other | 406 |
| 9 | Very close | 140 |
| 98 | Don't know | 3 |
| 99 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 216
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AM-1. REMARKS: Hand Card AM-1 contained responses 1-9.
- CLOSEWHT
- How close feel to whites
Survey Question: And in general, how close do you feel to Whites?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 8
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Not at all close | 7 |
| 5 | Neither one or the other | 276 |
| 9 | Very close | 300 |
| 98 | Don't know | 2 |
| 99 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 218
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AM-1. REMARKS: Hand Card AM-1 contained responses 1-9.
- HAPPY
- General happiness
Survey Question: Taken all together, how would you say things are these days -- would you say that you are very happy, pretty happy, or not too happy?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Very happy | 415 |
| 2 | Pretty happy | 784 |
| 3 | Not too happy | 170 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 220
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: In 1980 and 1987, this question was asked immediately before Q.158 (HAPMAR) on Form 3. For Form 1 and 2 this question immediately followed Q.157. See Q.248 for the split-ballot forms. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 34 and GSS Social Change Report No. 6. See Appendix P. See Q.164. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- HAPMAR
- Happiness of marriage
Survey Question: Taking things all together, how would you describe your marriage? Would you say that your marriage is very happy, pretty happy, or not too happy?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2161 |
| 1 | Very happy | 370 |
| 2 | Pretty happy | 215 |
| 3 | Not too happy | 18 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 221
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if currently married. REMARKS: See Q.157.
- HEALTH
- Condition of health
Survey Question: Would you say your own health, in general, is excellent, good, fair, or poor?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 911 |
| 1 | Excellent | 568 |
| 2 | Good | 854 |
| 3 | Fair | 322 |
| 4 | Poor | 103 |
| 8 | Don't know | 4 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 222
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- LIFE
- Is life exciting or dull
Survey Question: In general, do you find life exciting, pretty routine, or dull?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Exciting | 468 |
| 2 | Routine | 397 |
| 3 | Dull | 33 |
| 8 | Don't know | 26 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 223
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- HELPFUL
- People helpful or looking out for selves
Survey Question: Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful, or that they are mostly just looking out for themselves?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Helpful | 431 |
| 2 | Lookout for self | 391 |
| 3 | Depends | 88 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 224
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- FAIR
- People fair or try to take advantage
Survey Question: Do you think most people would try to take advantage of you if they got a chance, or would they try to be fair?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Take advantage | 361 |
| 2 | Fair | 451 |
| 3 | Depends | 97 |
| 8 | Don't know | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 225
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- TRUST
- Can people be trusted
Survey Question: Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you can't be too careful in life.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Can trust | 310 |
| 2 | Cannot trust | 528 |
| 3 | Depends | 72 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 226
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Q.163A appeared only on Form 1 in 1983. See Q.163B. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56. Q.163B appeared on Form 2 in 1983. It is a variant of Q.163A.
- CONFINAN
- Confidence in banks & financial institutions
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Banks and financial institutions?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 201 |
| 2 | Only some | 531 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 167 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 227
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONBUS
- Confidence in major companies
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Major companies?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 158 |
| 2 | Only some | 572 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 163 |
| 8 | Don't know | 18 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 228
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONCLERG
- Confidence in organized religion
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Organized religion?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 168 |
| 2 | Only some | 511 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 217 |
| 8 | Don't know | 14 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 229
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONEDUC
- Confidence in education
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Education?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 227 |
| 2 | Only some | 537 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 142 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 230
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONFED
- Confidence in exec branch of fed govt
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Executive branch of the federal government?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 243 |
| 2 | Only some | 455 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 193 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 231
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONLABOR
- Confidence in organized labor
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them: Organized labor?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 101 |
| 2 | Only some | 550 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 210 |
| 8 | Don't know | 50 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 232
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONPRESS
- Confidence in press
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Press?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 92 |
| 2 | Only some | 425 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 382 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 233
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONMEDIC
- Confidence in medicine
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Medicine?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 337 |
| 2 | Only some | 468 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 102 |
| 8 | Don't know | 5 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 234
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONTV
- Confidence in television
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? TV?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 87 |
| 2 | Only some | 429 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 388 |
| 8 | Don't know | 8 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 235
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONJUDGE
- Confidence in United States Supreme Court
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? U.S. Supreme Court?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 321 |
| 2 | Only some | 454 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 104 |
| 8 | Don't know | 32 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 236
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONSCI
- Confidence in scientific community
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Scientific Community?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 336 |
| 2 | Only some | 440 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 81 |
| 8 | Don't know | 55 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 237
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONLEGIS
- Confidence in Congress
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Congress?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 117 |
| 2 | Only some | 553 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 222 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 238
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- CONARMY
- Confidence in military
Survey Question: I am going to name some institutions in this country. As far as the people running these institutions are concerned, would you say you have a great deal of confidence, only some confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in them? Military?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A great deal | 492 |
| 2 | Only some | 343 |
| 3 | Hardly any | 63 |
| 8 | Don't know | 14 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 239
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AO. Read each item; code one for each. REMARKS: Card AO contained responses for Punches 1-3. See Appendix N for changes across surveys. In 1978, this question was asked immediately before Q.156 (Alienation) for the half of the sample with Form 2. For the half with Form 1, this question immediately followed Q.156. See Q.248 for the split-ballot form. In 1984, this question appeared on Forms 1 and 2, and a variant, Q.166, appeared on Form 3. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 1, 30, 31, and 80. See Appendix P. If planning to perform trend analysis with CONBUS, CONCLERG, and CONFINAN, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- OBEY
- To obey
Survey Question: If you had to choose, which thing on this list would you pick as the most important for a child to learn to prepare him or her for life? Which comes next in importance? Which comes third? Which comes fourth? [Which comes fifth?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Most important | 131 |
| 2 | 2nd important | 112 |
| 3 | 3rd important | 145 |
| 4 | 4th important | 367 |
| 5 | Least important | 144 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 13 |
Column: 240
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AT. Read choices. REMARKS: Card AT listed items A-E. Q.170 was asked on Form 2 in 1986. Q.168 was asked on Form 1 in 1986. See Appendix P.
- POPULAR
- To be well liked or popular
Survey Question: If you had to choose, which thing on this list would you pick as the most important for a child to learn to prepare him or her for life? Which comes next in importance? Which comes third? Which comes fourth? [Which comes fifth?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Most important | 4 |
| 2 | 2nd important | 11 |
| 3 | 3rd important | 32 |
| 4 | 4th important | 178 |
| 5 | Least important | 674 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 13 |
Column: 241
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AT. Read choices. REMARKS: Card AT listed items A-E. Q.170 was asked on Form 2 in 1986. Q.168 was asked on Form 1 in 1986. See Appendix P.
- THNKSELF
- To think for ones self
Survey Question: If you had to choose, which thing on this list would you pick as the most important for a child to learn to prepare him or her for life? Which comes next in importance? Which comes third? Which comes fourth? [Which comes fifth?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Most important | 447 |
| 2 | 2nd important | 183 |
| 3 | 3rd important | 118 |
| 4 | 4th important | 110 |
| 5 | Least important | 41 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 13 |
Column: 242
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AT. Read choices. REMARKS: Card AT listed items A-E. Q.170 was asked on Form 2 in 1986. Q.168 was asked on Form 1 in 1986. See Appendix P.
- WORKHARD
- To work hard
Survey Question: If you had to choose, which thing on this list would you pick as the most important for a child to learn to prepare him or her for life? Which comes next in importance? Which comes third? Which comes fourth? [Which comes fifth?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Most important | 190 |
| 2 | 2nd important | 314 |
| 3 | 3rd important | 288 |
| 4 | 4th important | 90 |
| 5 | Least important | 17 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 13 |
Column: 243
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AT. Read choices. REMARKS: Card AT listed items A-E. Q.170 was asked on Form 2 in 1986. Q.168 was asked on Form 1 in 1986. See Appendix P.
- HELPOTH
- To help others
Survey Question: If you had to choose, which thing on this list would you pick as the most important for a child to learn to prepare him or her for life? Which comes next in importance? Which comes third? Which comes fourth? [Which comes fifth?]
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Most important | 127 |
| 2 | 2nd important | 279 |
| 3 | 3rd important | 316 |
| 4 | 4th important | 154 |
| 5 | Least important | 23 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 13 |
Column: 244
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AT. Read choices. REMARKS: Card AT listed items A-E. Q.170 was asked on Form 2 in 1986. Q.168 was asked on Form 1 in 1986. See Appendix P.
- SOCREL
- Spend evening with relatives
Survey Question: Would you use this card and tell me which answer comes closest to how often you do the following things ... Spend a social evening with relatives?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Almost daily | 103 |
| 2 | Several times a week | 223 |
| 3 | Several times a month | 175 |
| 4 | Once a month | 150 |
| 5 | Several times a year | 153 |
| 6 | Once a year | 56 |
| 7 | Never | 45 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 1857 |
Column: 245
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AU. REMARKS: Card AU contained responses for Punches 1-7.
- SOCOMMUN
- Spend evening with neighbor
Survey Question: Would you use this card and tell me which answer comes closest to how often you do the following things ... Spend a social evening with someone who lives in your neighborhood?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Almost every day | 82 |
| 2 | Once/twice a week | 133 |
| 3 | Several times/month | 113 |
| 4 | Once a month | 108 |
| 5 | Several times/year | 103 |
| 6 | About once a year | 94 |
| 7 | Never | 272 |
| 8 | Don't know | 3 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 247
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AU. REMARKS: Card AU contained responses for Punches 1-7.
- SOCFREND
- Spend evening with friends
Survey Question: Would you use this card and tell me which answer comes closest to how often you do the following things ... Spend a social evening with friends who live outside the neighborhood?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Almost daily | 45 |
| 2 | Several times a week | 178 |
| 3 | Several times a month | 221 |
| 4 | Once a month | 196 |
| 5 | Several times a year | 139 |
| 6 | Once a year | 60 |
| 7 | Never | 67 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 1857 |
Column: 248
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AU. REMARKS: Card AU contained responses for Punches 1-7.
- SOCBAR
- Spend evening at bar
Survey Question: Would you use this card and tell me which answer comes closest to how often you do the following things ... Go to a bar or tavern?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Almost daily | 11 |
| 2 | Several times a week | 78 |
| 3 | Several times a month | 74 |
| 4 | Once a month | 114 |
| 5 | Several times a year | 108 |
| 6 | Once a year | 119 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 1857 |
Column: 250
Width: 2
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AU. REMARKS: Card AU contained responses for Punches 1-7.
- AGED
- Should aged live with their children
Survey Question: As you know, many older people share a home with their grown children. Do you think this is generally a good idea or a bad idea?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | A good idea | 433 |
| 2 | A bad idea | 301 |
| 3 | Depends | 176 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 252
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- JOBLOSE
- Is R likely to lose job
Survey Question: Thinking about the next 12 months, how likely do you think it is that you will lose your job or be laid off -- very likely, fairly likely, not too likely, or not at all likely?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2180 |
| 1 | Very likely | 37 |
| 2 | Fairly likely | 41 |
| 3 | Not too likely | 139 |
| 4 | Not likely | 360 |
| 5 | Leaving labor force | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 4 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 253
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- JOBFIND
- Could R find equally good job
Survey Question: About how easy would it be for you to find a job with another employer with approximately the same income and fringe benefits you now have? Would you say very easy, somewhat easy, or not easy at all?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2180 |
| 1 | Very easy | 156 |
| 2 | Somewhat easy | 211 |
| 3 | Not easy | 206 |
| 8 | Don't know | 9 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 254
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SATJOB
- Job or housework
Survey Question: On the whole, how satisfied are you with the work you do -- would you say you are very satisfied, moderately satisfied, a little dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1689 |
| 1 | Very satisfied | 534 |
| 2 | Mod. satisfied | 386 |
| 3 | A little dissatisfied | 100 |
| 4 | Very dissatisfied | 41 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 255
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] If currently working, temporarily not at work, or keeping house. REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- RICHWORK
- If rich, continue or stop working
Survey Question: If you were to get enough money to live as comfortably as you would like for the rest of your life, would you continue to work or would you stop working?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2113 |
| 1 | Continue working | 444 |
| 2 | Stop working | 201 |
| 8 | Don't know | 4 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 256
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if currently working or temporarily not at work. REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- CLASS
- Subjective class identification
Survey Question: If you were asked to use one of four names for your social class, which would you say you belong in: The lower class, the working class, the middle class, or the upper class?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Lower class | 167 |
| 2 | Working class | 1231 |
| 3 | Middle class | 1253 |
| 4 | Upper class | 94 |
| 5 | No class | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 15 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 257
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SATFIN
- Satisfaction with financial situation
Survey Question: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. So far as you and your family are concerned, would you say that you are pretty well satisfied with your present financial situation, more or less satisfied, or not satisfied at all?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Satisfied | 410 |
| 2 | More or less | 568 |
| 3 | Not at all sat | 391 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 258
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- FINALTER
- Change in financial situation
Survey Question: During the last few years, has your financial situation been getting better, worse, or has it stayed the same?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Better | 558 |
| 2 | Worse | 317 |
| 3 | Stayed same | 494 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 259
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- FINRELA
- Opinion of family income
Survey Question: Compared with American families in general, would you say your family income is far below average, below average, average, above average, or far above average? (PROBE: Just your best guess.)
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1393 |
| 1 | Far below average | 86 |
| 2 | Below average | 340 |
| 3 | Average | 646 |
| 4 | Above average | 255 |
| 5 | Far above average | 36 |
| 8 | Don't know | 8 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 260
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- WKSUB
- Does R or spouse have supervisor
Survey Question: Do you (does your [spouse]) have a supervisor on (your/his/her) job to whom you are (he/she/is) directly responsible?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1441 |
| 1 | Yes | 1057 |
| 2 | No | 264 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 261
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: If R is currently working (including those on vacation, strike, ill, last week) ask about R. If R married and not working -- ask about spouse if spouse is working. If neither R nor spouse is working, skip to Q.193. REMARKS: In 1991 this question was asked of respondents on all three ballots as compared to only two ballots in other years. This question was still asked of respondents' spouses, when applicable, on two ballots as done previously before 1991. See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- WKSUBS
- Does supervisor have supervisor
Survey Question: Does that person have a supervisor on the job to whom he is directly responsible?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1706 |
| 3 | Yes | 832 |
| 4 | No | 217 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 262
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES to Q191. REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- WKSUP
- Does R or spouse supervise anyone
Survey Question: In your (spouse's) job, (do you/does he/she) supervise anyone who is directly responsible to (you/him/her)?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1441 |
| 1 | Yes | 519 |
| 2 | No | 800 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 263
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: If R is currently working (including those on vacation, strike, ill, last week) ask about R. If R married and not working -- ask about spouse if spouse is working. If neither R nor spouse is working, skip to Q.193. REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- WKSUPS
- Does subordinate supervise anyone
Survey Question: Do any of those persons supervise anyone else?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2243 |
| 3 | Yes | 145 |
| 4 | No | 371 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 264
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if Yes to Q192. REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 11.
- UNEMP
- Ever unemployed in last ten yrs
Survey Question: At any time during the last ten years, have you been unemployed and looking for work for as long as a month?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Yes | 279 |
| 2 | No | 631 |
| 8 | Don't know | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 265
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask everyone.
- UNION
- Does R or spouse belong to union
Survey Question: Do you (or your [spouse]) belong to a labor union? (Who?)
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 933 |
| 1 | R belongs | 194 |
| 2 | Spouse belongs | 64 |
| 3 | R and spouse belong | 29 |
| 4 | Neither belongs | 1538 |
| 8 | Don't know | 5 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 266
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: In 1985 this question appeared on ISSP supplement, see Appendix R.
- GETAHEAD
- Opinion of how people get ahead
Survey Question: Some people say that people get ahead by their own hard work; others say that lucky breaks or help from other people are more important. Which do you think is most important?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Hard work | 578 |
| 2 | Both equally | 248 |
| 3 | Luck or help | 92 |
| 4 | Other | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 5 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 267
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for changes across survey. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- PARSOL
- R's living standard compared to parents
Survey Question: Compared to your parents when they were the age you are now, do you think your own standard of living now is much better, somewhat better, about the same, somewhat worse, or much worse than theirs was?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Much better | 303 |
| 2 | Somewhat better | 298 |
| 3 | About the same | 175 |
| 4 | Somewhat worse | 99 |
| 5 | Much worse | 24 |
| 8 | Don't know | 12 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 268
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- KIDSSOL
- R's kids living standard compared to R
Survey Question: When your children are at the age you are now, do you think their standard of living will be much better, somewhat better, about the same, somewhat worse, or much worse than yours is now?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Much better | 231 |
| 2 | Somewhat better | 305 |
| 3 | About the same | 161 |
| 4 | Somewhat worse | 73 |
| 5 | Much worse | 20 |
| 6 | No children (volunteered) | 105 |
| 8 | Don't know | 17 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 269
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- FEPOL
- Women not suited for politics
Survey Question: Tell me if you agree or disagree with this statement: Most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Agree | 185 |
| 2 | Disagree | 662 |
| 8 | Not sure | 60 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 270
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- ABDEFECT
- Strong chance of serious defect
Survey Question: Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if ... There is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 703 |
| 2 | No | 193 |
| 8 | Don't know | 24 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 271
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 19 and 42. In 1983 this question was asked immediately before Qs. 167 and 212 on Form 1. On Form 2 this question was immediately preceded by Qs. 167 and 212. See Q.248 for a discussion of the split-half sample design. See Appendix P.
- ABNOMORE
- Married -- wants no more children
Survey Question: Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if ... She is married and does not want any more children?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 400 |
| 2 | No | 493 |
| 8 | Don't know | 29 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 272
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 19 and 42. In 1983 this question was asked immediately before Qs. 167 and 212 on Form 1. On Form 2 this question was immediately preceded by Qs. 167 and 212. See Q.248 for a discussion of the split-half sample design. See Appendix P.
- ABHLTH
- Woman's health seriously endangered
Survey Question: Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if ... The woman's own health is seriously endangered by the pregnancy?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 825 |
| 2 | No | 76 |
| 8 | Don't know | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 273
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 19 and 42. In 1983 this question was asked immediately before Qs. 167 and 212 on Form 1. On Form 2 this question was immediately preceded by Qs. 167 and 212. See Q.248 for a discussion of the split-half sample design. See Appendix P.
- ABPOOR
- Low income -- can't afford more children
Survey Question: Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if ... The family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 396 |
| 2 | No | 496 |
| 8 | Don't know | 29 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 274
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 19 and 42. In 1983 this question was asked immediately before Qs. 167 and 212 on Form 1. On Form 2 this question was immediately preceded by Qs. 167 and 212. See Q.248 for a discussion of the split-half sample design. See Appendix P.
- ABRAPE
- Pregnant as result of rape
Survey Question: Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if ... She became pregnant as a result of rape?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 721 |
| 2 | No | 184 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 275
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 19 and 42. In 1983 this question was asked immediately before Qs. 167 and 212 on Form 1. On Form 2 this question was immediately preceded by Qs. 167 and 212. See Q.248 for a discussion of the split-half sample design. See Appendix P.
- ABSINGLE
- Not married
Survey Question: Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if ... She is not married and does not want to marry the man?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 376 |
| 2 | No | 519 |
| 8 | Don't know | 27 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 276
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 19 and 42. In 1983 this question was asked immediately before Qs. 167 and 212 on Form 1. On Form 2 this question was immediately preceded by Qs. 167 and 212. See Q.248 for a discussion of the split-half sample design. See Appendix P.
- ABANY
- Abortion if woman wants for any reason
Survey Question: Please tell me whether or not you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if ... The woman wants it for any reason?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 387 |
| 2 | No | 513 |
| 8 | Don't know | 23 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 277
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Reports Nos. 19 and 42. In 1983 this question was asked immediately before Qs. 167 and 212 on Form 1. On Form 2 this question was immediately preceded by Qs. 167 and 212. See Q.248 for a discussion of the split-half sample design. See Appendix P.
- CHLDIDEL
- Ideal number of children
Survey Question: What do you think is the ideal number of children for a family to have?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 7 | Seven+ | 1 |
| 8 | As many as want | 79 |
| 9 | Don't know, not available | 14 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 1857 |
Column: 278
Width: 2
Type: numeric
- PILLOK
- Birth control to teenagers 14-16
Survey Question: Do you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that methods of birth control should be available to teenagers between the ages of 14 and 16 if their parents do not approve?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly agree | 274 |
| 2 | Agree | 238 |
| 3 | Disagree | 175 |
| 4 | Strongly disagree | 201 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 280
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with TEENPILL, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- SEXEDUC
- Sex education in public schools
Survey Question: Would you be for or against sex education in the public schools?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Favor | 787 |
| 2 | Oppose | 103 |
| 3 | Depends | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 18 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 281
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult Methodological Report No. 56.
- DIVLAW
- Divorce laws
Survey Question: Should divorce in this country be easier or more difficult to obtain than it is now?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Easier | 238 |
| 2 | More difficult | 447 |
| 3 | Stay same | 196 |
| 8 | Don't know | 23 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 282
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Q.215A was asked both on Form 1 and Form 2 at different points in the interview in 1978. See App. B for locations in the questionnaire. See Appendix P.
- PREMARSX
- Sex before marriage
Survey Question: There's been a lot of discussion about the way morals and attitudes about sex are changing in this country. If a man and woman have sex relations before marriage, do you think it is always wrong, almost always wrong, wrong only sometimes, or not wrong at all?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Always wrong | 242 |
| 2 | Almost always wrong | 73 |
| 3 | Sometimes wrong | 176 |
| 4 | Not wrong at all | 394 |
| 5 | Other | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 18 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 283
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes. See GSS Social Change Report No. 35.
- TEENSEX
- Sex before marriage -- teens 14-16
Survey Question: What if they are in their early teens, say 14 to 16 years old? In that case, do you think sex relations before marriage are always wrong, almost always wrong, wrong only sometimes, or not wrong at all?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Always wrong | 644 |
| 2 | Almost always wrong | 131 |
| 3 | Sometimes wrong | 78 |
| 4 | Not wrong at all | 37 |
| 5 | Other | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 16 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 284
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- XMARSEX
- Sex with person other than spouse
Survey Question: What is your opinion about a married person having sexual relations with someone other than the marriage partner -- is it always wrong, almost always wrong, wrong only sometimes, or not wrong at all?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Always wrong | 725 |
| 2 | Almost always wrong | 124 |
| 3 | Sometimes wrong | 39 |
| 4 | Not wrong at all | 19 |
| 5 | Other | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 17 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 285
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- HOMOSEX
- Homosexual sex relations
Survey Question: What about sexual relations between two adults of the same sex -- do you think it is always wrong, almost always wrong, wrong only sometimes, or not wrong at all?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Always wrong | 486 |
| 2 | Almost always wrong | 43 |
| 3 | Sometimes wrong | 63 |
| 4 | Not wrong at all | 292 |
| 5 | Other | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 35 |
| 9 | Not available | 5 |
Column: 286
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Contents of Punch 5 (Other, SPECIFY), available from NORC. See Appendix N for across survey changes. If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- PORNLAW
- Feelings about pornography laws
Survey Question: Which of these statements comes closest to your feelings about pornography laws?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Illegal to all | 343 |
| 2 | Illegal under 18 | 512 |
| 3 | Legal | 47 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 4 |
Column: 287
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card AX. Read first three categories only. Circle only one code. REMARKS: Card AX contains responses 1-3.
- XMOVIE
- Seen x-rated movie in last year
Survey Question: Have you seen an X-rated movie in the last year?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Yes | 219 |
| 2 | No | 690 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 288
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: In 1994, XMOVIE was asked on Versions 2, 3, 8, 9 and XMOVIE1 on Versions 5 and 6.
- SPANKING
- Favor spanking to discipline child
Survey Question: Do you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree that it is sometimes necessary to discipline a child with a good, hard spanking?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly agree | 272 |
| 2 | Agree | 387 |
| 3 | Disagree | 176 |
| 4 | Strongly disagree | 64 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 289
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- LETDIE1
- Allow incurable patients to die
Survey Question: When a person has a disease that cannot be cured, do you think doctors should be allowed by law to end the patient's life by some painless means if the patient and his family request it?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 599 |
| 2 | No | 288 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 290
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SUICIDE1
- Suicide if incurable disease
Survey Question: Do you think a person has the right to end his or her own life if this person ... Has an incurable disease?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 524 |
| 2 | No | 364 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 291
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SUICIDE2
- Suicide if bankrupt
Survey Question: Do you think a person has the right to end his or her own life if this person ... Has gone bankrupt?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 76 |
| 2 | No | 820 |
| 8 | Don't know | 11 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 292
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SUICIDE3
- Suicide if dishonored family
Survey Question: Do you think a person has the right to end his or her own life if this person ... Has dishonored his or her family?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 79 |
| 2 | No | 819 |
| 8 | Don't know | 10 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 293
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- SUICIDE4
- Suicide if tired of living
Survey Question: Do you think a person has the right to end his or her own life if this person ... Is tired of living and ready to die?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 136 |
| 2 | No | 759 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 294
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- POLHITOK
- Ever approve of police striking citizen
Survey Question: Are there any situations you can imagine in which you would approve of a policeman striking an adult male citizen?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Yes | 599 |
| 2 | No | 250 |
| 8 | Don't know | 63 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 295
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: In 1973 and 1975, those replying "no" to Q.232 (Punch 2, Col. 900) were not asked parts A-D. Since 1975, all respondents were asked parts A-D regardless of response to Q.232. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 10. If planning to perform trend analysis with these variables, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- POLABUSE
- Citizen said vulgar or obscene things
Survey Question: Would you approve of a policeman striking a citizen who ... Had said vulgar and obscene things to the policeman?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Yes | 59 |
| 2 | No | 833 |
| 8 | Don't know | 19 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 296
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES or NOT SURE in Q.232. REMARKS: In 1973 and 1975, those replying "no" to Q.232 (Punch 2, Col. 900) were not asked parts A-D. Since 1975, all respondents were asked parts A-D regardless of response to Q.232. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 10. If planning to perform trend analysis with these variables, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- POLMURDR
- Citizen questioned as murder suspect
Survey Question: Would you approve of a policeman striking a citizen who ... Was being questioned as a suspect in a murder case?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Yes | 81 |
| 2 | No | 806 |
| 8 | Don't know | 25 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 297
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES or NOT SURE in Q.232. REMARKS: In 1973 and 1975, those replying "no" to Q.232 (Punch 2, Col. 900) were not asked parts A-D. Since 1975, all respondents were asked parts A-D regardless of response to Q.232. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 10. If planning to perform trend analysis with these variables, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- POLESCAP
- Citizen attempting to escape custody
Survey Question: Would you approve of a policeman striking a citizen who ... Was attempting to escape from custody?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Yes | 611 |
| 2 | No | 224 |
| 8 | Don't know | 76 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 298
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES or NOT SURE in Q.232. REMARKS: In 1973 and 1975, those replying "no" to Q.232 (Punch 2, Col. 900) were not asked parts A-D. Since 1975, all respondents were asked parts A-D regardless of response to Q.232. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 10. If planning to perform trend analysis with these variables, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- POLATTAK
- Citizen attacking policeman with fists
Survey Question: Would you approve of a policeman striking a citizen who ... Was attacking the policeman with his fists?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Yes | 810 |
| 2 | No | 85 |
| 8 | Don't know | 16 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 299
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES or NOT SURE in Q.232. REMARKS: In 1973 and 1975, those replying "no" to Q.232 (Punch 2, Col. 900) were not asked parts A-D. Since 1975, all respondents were asked parts A-D regardless of response to Q.232. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 10. If planning to perform trend analysis with these variables, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- FEAR
- Afraid to walk at night in neighborhood
Survey Question: Is there any area right around here -- that is, within a mile -- where you would be afraid to walk alone at night?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 296 |
| 2 | No | 623 |
| 8 | Don't know | 5 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 300
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: See Appendix N for across survey changes.
- OWNGUN
- Have gun in home
Survey Question: Do you happen to have in your home (if House: "or garage") any guns or revolvers?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 310 |
| 2 | No | 605 |
| 3 | Refused | 9 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 301
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Punch 2 in Cols. 907, 908, and 909 includes those answering "No" to Q.237 and 237A.
- PISTOL
- Pistol or revolver in home
Survey Question: Is it a pistol, shotgun, rifle, or what?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 180 |
| 2 | No | 734 |
| 3 | Refused | 10 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 302
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES to Q.237. Code all that apply. REMARKS: Punch 2 in Cols. 907, 908, and 909 includes those answering "No" to Q.237 and 237A.
- SHOTGUN
- Shotgun in home
Survey Question: Is it a pistol, shotgun, rifle, or what?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 195 |
| 2 | No | 719 |
| 3 | Refused | 10 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 303
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES to Q.237. Code all that apply. REMARKS: Punch 2 in Cols. 907, 908, and 909 includes those answering "No" to Q.237 and 237A.
- RIFLE
- Rifle in home
Survey Question: Is it a pistol, shotgun, rifle, or what?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Yes | 183 |
| 2 | No | 731 |
| 3 | Refused | 10 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 304
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Ask if YES to Q.237. Code all that apply. REMARKS: Punch 2 in Cols. 907, 908, and 909 includes those answering "No" to Q.237 and 237A.
- ROWNGUN
- Does gun belong to R
Survey Question: Do any of these guns personally belong to you? REMARKS: Punch 2 in Cols. 907, 908, and 909 includes those answering "No" to Q.237 and 237A.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2446 |
| 1 | Yes | 239 |
| 2 | No | 71 |
| 3 | Refused | 9 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 305
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- HUNT
- Does R or spouse hunt
Survey Question: Do you (or does your [husband/wife]) go hunting?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1841 |
| 1 | Resp | 129 |
| 2 | Spouse | 24 |
| 3 | Both | 18 |
| 4 | Neither | 752 |
| 8 | Don't know | 1 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 306
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Circle only one code.
- NEWS
- How often does R read newspaper
Survey Question: How often do you read the newspaper -- every day, a few times a week, once a week, less than once a week, or never?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Everyday | 369 |
| 2 | Few times a week | 219 |
| 3 | Once a week | 109 |
| 4 | Less than once wk | 121 |
| 5 | Never | 90 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 307
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- TVHOURS
- Hours per day watching TV
Survey Question: On the average day, about how many hours do you personally watch television?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 0
Maximum value= 97
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 98 | Don't know | 3 |
| 99 | Not available | 0 |
| -1 | Not applicable | 1857 |
Column: 308
Width: 2
Type: numeric
- PHONE
- Does R have telephone
Survey Question: May I have your name and (one of your) telephone number(s) just in case I have left something out in this interview?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | No phone | 17 |
| 2 | Refused | 132 |
| 3 | Phone in home | 2498 |
| 4 | Phone elsewhere | 116 |
| 5 | Phone, don't know where | 2 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 310
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Enter name and phone number. If no phone or refused, circle appropriate code number.
- COOP
- R's attitude toward interview
Survey Question: In general, what was the respondent's attitude toward the interview?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 0 |
| 1 | Friendly, interested | 2232 |
| 2 | cooperative | 398 |
| 3 | Restless, impatient | 111 |
| 4 | hostile | 10 |
| 8 | Don't know | 14 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 311
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Interviewer's response. REMARKS: If planning to perform trend analysis with this variable, please consult GSS Methodological Report No. 56.
- COMPREND
- R's understanding of questions
Survey Question: Was respondent's understanding of the questions?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 1 | Good | 2380 |
| 2 | Fair | 303 |
| 3 | Poor | 69 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 312
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Interviewer's response. Code one.
- FORM
- Form of split questionnaire asked
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | No split ques | 0 |
| 1 | Standard <X> | 1358 |
| 2 | Alternate <Y> | 1407 |
| 3 | Alternate <Z> | 0 |
Column: 313
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: A split ballot was used in the 1973, 1974, 1976, 1978, 1980, and 1982-2002 surveys. The variant or "Y" wordings appear on Form 2; the "Z" wordings appear on Form 3; and the standard GSS wordings appear on Form 1. See Appendix P for what variables were on what form. See Q.1407 for use of weight variable. See Appendix T, GSS Methodological Report No. 36. See also Qs. 1404 and 1405.
- FECHLD
- Mother working doesn't hurt children
Survey Question: Now I'm going to read several more statements. As I read each one, please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. For example, here is the statement: A working mother can establish just as warm and secure a relationship with her children as a mother who does not work.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly agree | 218 |
| 2 | Agree | 355 |
| 3 | Disagree | 244 |
| 4 | Strongly disagree | 84 |
| 8 | Don't know | 7 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 314
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Qs. 249-264 are part of methodological experiments.
- FEPRESCH
- Preschool kids suffer if mother works
Survey Question: Now I'm going to read several more statements. As I read each one, please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. For example, here is the statement: Preschool child is likely to suffer if his or her mother works.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly agree | 88 |
| 2 | Agree | 322 |
| 3 | Disagree | 392 |
| 4 | Strongly disagree | 96 |
| 8 | Don't know | 10 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 315
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Qs. 249-264 are part of methodological experiments.
- FEFAM
- Better for man to work, woman tend home
Survey Question: Now I'm going to read several more statements. As I read each one, please tell me whether you strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree with it. For example, here is the statement: It is much better for everyone involved if the man is the achiever outside the home and the woman takes care of the home and family.
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly agree | 91 |
| 2 | Agree | 257 |
| 3 | Disagree | 382 |
| 4 | Strongly disagree | 168 |
| 8 | Don't know | 9 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 316
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Qs. 249-264 are part of methodological experiments.
- RACDIF1
- Differences due to discrimination
Survey Question: On the average (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) have worse jobs, income, and housing than white people. Do you think these differences are ... Mainly due to discrimination?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 304 |
| 2 | No | 575 |
| 8 | Don't know | 28 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 317
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Asked of Non-Blacks only in 1977. See Appendix N for changes in wording across surveys.
- RACDIF2
- Differences due to inborn disability
Survey Question: On the average (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) have worse jobs, income, and housing than white people. Do you think these differences are ... Because most (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) have less in-born ability to learn?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 106 |
| 2 | No | 781 |
| 8 | Don't know | 21 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 318
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Asked of Non-Blacks only in 1977. See Appendix N for changes in wording across surveys.
- RACDIF3
- Differences due to lack of education
Survey Question: On the average (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) have worse jobs, income, and housing than white people. Do you think these differences are ... Because most (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) don't have the chance for education that it takes to rise out of poverty?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 390 |
| 2 | No | 491 |
| 8 | Don't know | 26 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 319
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Asked of Non-Blacks only in 1977. See Appendix N for changes in wording across surveys.
- RACDIF4
- Differences due to lack of will
Survey Question: On the average (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) have worse jobs, income, and housing than white people. Do you think these differences are ... Because most (Negroes/Blacks/African-Americans) just don't have the motivation or will power to pull themselves up out of poverty?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Yes | 435 |
| 2 | No | 425 |
| 8 | Don't know | 45 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 320
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: REMARKS: Asked of Non-Blacks only in 1977. See Appendix N for changes in wording across surveys.
- HELPPOOR
- Should govt improve standard of living
Survey Question: I'd like to talk with you about issues some people tell us are important. Please look at Card BC. Some people think that the government in Washington should do everything possible to improve the standard of living of all poor Americans; they are at Point 1 on this card. Other people think it is not the government's responsibility, and that each person should take care of himself; they are at Point 5. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you have up your mind on this?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 4
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Govt action | 154 |
| 3 | agree with both | 420 |
| 5 | people help selves | 104 |
| 8 | Don't know | 23 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 321
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BC. For Qs. 309 through 312. If respondent has not made up his/her mind on an issue, code "Don't know." This is an acceptable response ... do not probe.
- HELPNOT
- Should govt do more or less
Survey Question: Now look at Card BD. Some people think that the government in Washington is trying to do too many things that should be left to individuals and private businesses. Others disagree and think that the government should do even more to solve our country's problems. Still others have opinions somewhere in between. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you made up your mind on this?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Govt do more | 129 |
| 2 | In between | 93 |
| 3 | Agree with both | 431 |
| 4 | In between | 123 |
| 5 | Govt does too much | 108 |
| 8 | Don't know | 27 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 322
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BD. For Qs. 309 through 312. If respondent has not made up his/her mind on an issue, code "Don't know." This is an acceptable response ... do not probe.
- HELPSICK
- Should govt help pay for medical care
Survey Question: Look at Card BE. In general, some people think that it is the responsibility of the government in Washington to see to it that people have help in paying for doctors and hospital bills. Others think that these matters are not the responsibility of the federal government and that people should take care of these things themselves. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you made up your mind on this?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Govt should help | 287 |
| 2 | In between | 175 |
| 3 | Agree with both | 308 |
| 4 | In between | 65 |
| 5 | People help selves | 63 |
| 8 | Don't know | 13 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 323
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BE. For Qs. 309 through 312. If respondent has not made up his/her mind on an issue, code "Don't know." This is an acceptable response ... do not probe.
- HELPBLK
- Should govt aid blacks
Survey Question: Now look at Card BF. Some people think that (Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans) have been discriminated against for so long that the government has a special obligation to help improve their living standards. Others believe that the government should not be giving special treatment to (Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans). Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you made up your mind on this?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1853 |
| 1 | Govt help blks | 76 |
| 2 | In between | 72 |
| 3 | Agree with both | 282 |
| 4 | In between | 177 |
| 5 | No special treatment | 283 |
| 8 | Don't know | 20 |
| 9 | Not available | 2 |
Column: 324
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BF. For Qs. 309 through 312. If respondent has not made up his/her mind on an issue, code "Don't know." This is an acceptable response ... do not probe.
- WLTHWHTS
- Rich -- poor
Survey Question: Now I have some questions about different groups in our society. I'm going to show you a seven-point scale on which the characteristics of people in a group can be rated. In the first statement a score of 1 means that you think almost all of the people in that group are "rich." A score of 7 means that you think almost everyone in the group are "poor." A score of 4 means you think that the group is not towards one end or another, and of course you may choose any number in between that comes closest to where you think people in the group stand. Where would you rate Whites in general on this scale?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Rich | 36 |
| 7 | Poor | 6 |
| 8 | Don't know | 18 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 325
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BR. REMARKS: Hand Card BR contained the 7-point scale for each dimension (Parts A-F) of Q.403. Choice of "don't know" was not given on the card.
- WLTHBLKS
- Rich -- poor
Survey Question: Now I have some questions about different groups in our society. I'm going to show you a seven-point scale on which the characteristics of people in a group can be rated. In the first statement a score of 1 means that you think almost all of the people in that group are "rich." A score of 7 means that you think almost everyone in the group are "poor." A score of 4 means you think that the group is not towards one end or another, and of course you may choose any number in between that comes closest to where you think people in the group stand. Blacks?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Rich | 7 |
| 7 | Poor | 38 |
| 8 | Don't know | 16 |
| 9 | Not available | 3 |
Column: 326
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BR. REMARKS: Hand Card BR contained the 7-point scale for each dimension (Parts A-F) of Q.403. Choice of "don't know" was not given on the card.
- WORKWHTS
- Hard working -- lazy
Survey Question: The second set of characteristics asks if people in the group tend to be hard-working or if they tend to be lazy. Where would you rate Whites in general on this scale?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Hardworking | 71 |
| 7 | Lazy | 6 |
| 8 | Don't know | 22 |
| 9 | Not available | 7 |
Column: 327
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BR. REMARKS: Hand Card BR contained the 7-point scale for each dimension (Parts A-F) of Q.403. Choice of "don't know" was not given on the card.
- WORKBLKS
- Hard working -- lazy
Survey Question: The second set of characteristics asks if people in the group tend to be hard-working or if they tend to be lazy. Blacks?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Hardworking | 37 |
| 7 | Lazy | 34 |
| 8 | Don't know | 23 |
| 9 | Not available | 7 |
Column: 328
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BR. REMARKS: Hand Card BR contained the 7-point scale for each dimension (Parts A-F) of Q.403. Choice of "don't know" was not given on the card.
- INTLWHTS
- Unintelligent -- intelligent
Survey Question: Do people in these groups tend to be unintelligent or tend to be intelligent? Where would you rate Whites in general on this scale?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Unintelligent | 4 |
| 7 | Intelligent | 64 |
| 8 | Don't know | 23 |
| 9 | Not available | 10 |
Column: 329
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BR. REMARKS: Hand Card BR contained the 7-point scale for each dimension (Parts A-F) of Q.403. Choice of "don't know" was not given on the card.
- INTLBLKS
- Unintelligent -- intelligent
Survey Question: Do people in these groups tend to be unintelligent or tend to be intelligent? Blacks?
Range of Valid Numeric Responses
Minimum value= 2
Maximum value= 6
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Unintelligent | 14 |
| 7 | Intelligent | 36 |
| 8 | Don't know | 25 |
| 9 | Not available | 9 |
Column: 330
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: Hand [respondent] Card BR. REMARKS: Hand Card BR contained the 7-point scale for each dimension (Parts A-F) of Q.403. Choice of "don't know" was not given on the card.
- LIVEBLKS
- Neighborhood half black
Survey Question: Now I'm going to ask you about different types of contact with various groups of people. In each situation would you please tell me whether you would be very much in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very much opposed to it happening? Living in a neighborhood where half of your neighbors were Blacks?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly favor | 109 |
| 2 | Favor | 173 |
| 3 | Neither favor nor oppose | 396 |
| 4 | Oppose | 153 |
| 5 | Strongly oppose | 71 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 331
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- LIVEWHTS
- R favor living in half white neighborhood
Survey Question: Now I'm going to ask you about different types of contact with various groups of people. In each situation would you please tell me whether you would be very much in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very much opposed to it happening? Living in a neighborhood where half of your neighbors were Whites?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Very much in favor | 257 |
| 2 | Somewhat in favor | 212 |
| 3 | Neither in favor nor opposed | 365 |
| 4 | Somewhat opposed | 48 |
| 5 | Very much opposed | 19 |
| 8 | Don't know | 7 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 332
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- MARJEW
- Close relative marry Jew
Survey Question: What about having a close relative marry a Jewish person? Would you be very in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very opposed to it happening? A Jewish person?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2765 |
| 1 | Strongly favor | 0 |
| 2 | Favor | 0 |
| 3 | Neither favor nor oppose | 0 |
| 4 | Oppose | 0 |
| 5 | Strongly oppose | 0 |
| 8 | Don't know | 0 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 333
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- MARBLK
- Close relative marry black
Survey Question: How about having a close relative or family member marry a black person? Would you be very in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very opposed to it happening?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Strongly favor | 186 |
| 2 | Favor | 102 |
| 3 | Neither favor nor oppose | 356 |
| 4 | Oppose | 127 |
| 5 | Strongly oppose | 131 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 0 |
Column: 334
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- MARWHT
- R favor close relative marrying white person
Survey Question: What about having a close relative marry a white person? Would you be very in favor of it happening, somewhat in favor, neither in favor nor opposed to it happening, somewhat opposed, or very opposed to it happening?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 1857 |
| 1 | Very in favor | 478 |
| 2 | Somewhat in favor | 109 |
| 3 | Neither in favor nor opposed | 275 |
| 4 | Somewhat opposed | 26 |
| 5 | Very opposed | 13 |
| 8 | Don't know | 6 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 335
Width: 1
Type: numeric
- RACWORK
- Racial makeup of workplace
Survey Question: Are the people who work where you work all white, mostly white, about half and half, mostly black, or all black?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
| 0 | Not applicable | 2156 |
| 1 | All white | 155 |
| 2 | Mostly white | 291 |
| 3 | Half white -- black | 117 |
| 4 | Mostly black | 28 |
| 5 | All black | 7 |
| 6 | Works alone | 0 |
| 8 | Don't work | 10 |
| 9 | Not available | 1 |
Column: 336
Width: 1
Type: numeric
Text: [Ask] if employed.
- DISCAFF
- Whites hurt by aff. action
Survey Question: What do you think the chances are these days that a white person won't get a job or promotion while an equally or less qualified black person gets one instead? Is this very likely, somewhat likely, or not very likely to happen these days?
| Response Categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Label | Frequency |
Saved questions